GRE写作范文学习法具体步骤

《GRE写作范文学习法具体步骤》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《GRE写作范文学习法具体步骤（11页珍藏版）》请在装配图网上搜索。

1、GRE写作范文学习法详细步骤GRE写作范文学习法详细步骤分享选择有价值的GRE范文对范文的学习不能囫囵吞枣如何才能把一篇优秀的文章消化成自己的词库和句库，并写好GRE作文?考生首先需要明确这样一个概念，那就是学习就像吃饭。安康的饮食是摄入与吸收并重，而参加GRE考试并且作文复习已经到达看范文程度的考生，相信对写作构造都有了一定的理解，正在进入写作学习的第二个阶段：语言积累和应用。吸收好的文章是提升表达多样性和表达难度最快的方法。而吸收的方法和步骤，将很大程度决定考生复习的效率和成果。GRE高分范文学习法分享1. 准备优质范文的word版。word自带校验功能，能很方便地找出一些拼写和用词上的低

2、级错误。2. 画出自己认识但是写作的时候又想不到用的表达。认识说明你背到过，想不到说明你还不会运用。考生要把已经掌握的词汇库充分运用起来。3. 生词和表达多样性要单独罗列在段落下面，方便总结和参考。4. 翻译成正常的汉语，翻译成汉语有助于加深理解，并为后面步骤做好准备。5. 看着汉语再次翻译成英语。这个步骤其实也就是改写，是帮助大家摆脱模板，写出自己风格的文章必须经历的过程。6. 对照原文找差异，尤其是好的内容必须会写，而其他的大概意思符合原文即可。GRE写作高分范文：过度专业化问题GRE写作题目：“Academic disciplines have bee so specialized in

3、 recent years that scholars ideas reach only a narrow audience. Until scholars can reach a wider audience，their ideas will have little use.”近些年来，学科已经细化到了相当的程度以致于学者们的理念只影响小范围的人群。除非学者们能拥有影响等大范围的人群，否那么他们的理念将几乎毫无用途。GRE写作范文：Although academic disciplines have bee so specialized in recent years，scholars id

4、eas can still reach a wide audience by the advantage of the knowledge structure. We can simply put that it is the human beings knowledge structure that makes it possible for a scholars ideas in his specialized discipline to reach a much wider audiences who dont necessarily belong to his own discipli

5、ne.The reason why I draw this conclusion will be illustrated by recalling the process of social evolution.During the passed centuries，the social economy has been greatly boosted by the revolutions in science and technology，which in turn increases the width and depth of academic disciplines to solve

6、unencountered and more plex problems arising in the new situations. To solve new problems，we probably need new methods. That will undoubtedly calls for invention of new ideas，which will certainly adds to human beings knowledge. Thus with the progress of science and technology，more and more knowledge

7、 will be added to the old system. A new problem will e： how the newly obtained knowledge is organized. This problem will be clear when we make classification of the new knowledge according to the old knowledge system. If there is content of the newly-get that doesnt properly belong to any sort of th

8、e old system，it means anew discipline will emerge. But could we just assert that the newly formed discipline doesnt possess any relationship with any of the old ones? Certainly not. This is because the new knowledge is obtained through the old methods，which obviously means the new knowledge do have

9、some connections with some old disciplines，otherwise I am quite sure we could not find it!From the above，we can easily reach the conclusion that every academic discipline has certain relationships with some other ones. The structure of humans knowledge is just like the plexity of a ! And also it is

10、a natural trend that academic disciplines bee more and more specialized.With the depositing and specializing process of knowledge，it causes humans to acmodate themselves to this situation. Because the God gives every person a limited time and energy，it is necessary for a person，who wants to make pro

11、gress in his discipline，to adjust his knowledge structure to adapt to his research domain，that is to say，to be more devoted to his own research area. On the other hand，if he cares too much for unrelated or less related area，he will probably not be able to bring innovation to his main academic discip

12、line. Simply put，we almost cannot find a man who constructs the Theory of Relativity and in the mean time poses symphony like Mozarts! So we can say every scholar must be more devoted to his own discipline than to others，but a wider knowledge of other disciplines sometimes involuntarily invokes spar

13、ks of new ideas.GRE写作高分范文：权威问题Much of the information that people assume isfactualactually turns out to be inaccurate. Thus，any piece of information referred to as afactshould be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future.大多数人们认为是事实的信息结果实际上都是不准确的。因此，任何据称是事实的信息都应该被质疑，因为它在将来很可能会被证明为是错误

14、的。GRE写作范文：Should we be doubtful to all the information at hands because the rightness of which is uncertain? The speaker claims so，I concede that people often mit various fallacies in the course of cognizing things，however I fundamentally take exception of the arguers assertion to mistrust every fac

15、t we might encounter. And I will substantially discuss my views thereinafter.To begin with，the speaker seems to implicate that a fact would be proven false in the future under numerous circumstance. Nevertheless I prefer to arguer that facts never change. No matter how did the Medieval Church and In

16、quisition persecute Bruno，the fact never changes that the earth is far from being the center of the universe as the religious sovereigns had assumed or hoped for，while just a minor particle in it. Equally，no matter how Edison had tried to incite the public fear and distrust to the alternative curren

17、t electricity，the fact never changes that Teals electrical system is vastly superior to his direct current electrical one，and would be accepted and applied in larger range.However，what do change are the humans objective interpretations to facts. One pelling argument to this point is that，due to the

18、limitation of humans knowledge and prehensive capability，they tend to make insufficient or even false understanding to the certain fact. An apt illustration is the changes ofcognition to disease. While at the ancient time，our progenitors believed the a man being a patient for the reason that he had

19、conduct crimes or offended some ghosts or spirits，the contemporary people have well know that the varies of pathogens are the basic causes to our diseases，and the defects of our immune system and so forth are also the factors as well. Another argument for the change of prehension to fact is that dif

20、ferent people always observe and interpret from different perspectives. Though the Relativity theory is not well pliable with the Quantum mechanism，no one call the greatness of both Einstein and Bohr，because their theories are based on distinct views，the former from the macrocosm and the later from

21、the microcosm.Notwithstanding the foregoing reasons for that human tend to make fallacies during the cause of prehending and cognizing facts，these reasons should never be the excuses to doubt every conclusion we might draw from facts. Based on certain rational inference and proper knowledge fundamen

22、t，the conclusions we make might well be justifiable，if not pletely right，to certain degree. What we need to do is to promote the enterprise of pursuing the better answer and try to use the result we have get to application，instead of wasting our time to undue doubt and suspicion. Though the medical

23、scientists have not fully understood the mechanism of how the does the implanted organ interact with the wounded body，they are not refrain from using the implanting skill to save patients，of course the precondition or which is that this technology is much well established than the fundamental theory.第 11 页 共 11 页