岗位评估英文资料(PPT 49页)

上传人:痛*** 文档编号:161866763 上传时间:2022-10-15 格式:PPTX 页数:49 大小:447.78KB
收藏 版权申诉 举报 下载
岗位评估英文资料(PPT 49页)_第1页
第1页 / 共49页
岗位评估英文资料(PPT 49页)_第2页
第2页 / 共49页
岗位评估英文资料(PPT 49页)_第3页
第3页 / 共49页
资源描述:

《岗位评估英文资料(PPT 49页)》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《岗位评估英文资料(PPT 49页)(49页珍藏版)》请在装配图网上搜索。

1、Job EvaluationOld,Bold or a Story UntoldMarcus DowningHay GroupContent1.What is Job Evaluation?2.Job Evaluation Processes and Guidelines3.Job Evaluation and Pay4.Setting Reward Structures Using Job Evaluation5.Job Evaluation and Salary Management6.Job Evaluation Benefits 7.Job Evaluation Risks and C

2、onsiderationsWhat is Job Evaluation?What is Job Evaluation?Job Evaluation is a systematic process for ranking or rating jobs logically and fairly by comparing job against job or against a pre-determined scale to determine the relative importance of jobs to an organisation.Which is to say that Job Ev

3、aluation IS Comparative Judgemental Structured Job CentredIS Not Absolute Scientific Unstructured Person FocusedPossible Applications for Job Evaluation JOB EVALUATIONRewardOrganisational AnalysisGradingCareer DevelopmentSuccession PlanningIdentifying gaps in the structureUnderstand relationships be

4、tween rolesLink to market dataUnderstanding possible career pathsUnderpin the frameworkDifferent Types of Evaluation MethodMethod ofComparison UsedMethod of Analysis UsedBy consideringJob ElementsPoint MethodFactor ComparisonMethodComparing JobAgainst SomeScaleComparing JobAgainst JobBy consideringt

5、he Entire JobClassificationMethodRankingMethodHay is a Modified Factor Comparison MethodArsenalBoltonChelseaArsenalBoltonChelseaXXX333000TotalRank303612Job RankingChief ExecutiveHR ManagerSecurityChief ExecutiveHR ManagerSecurityXXX330003TotalRank032613Job RankingDifferent Types of Evaluation Method

6、Method ofComparison UsedMethod of Analysis UsedBy consideringJob ElementsPoint MethodFactor ComparisonMethodComparing JobAgainst SomeScaleComparing JobAgainst JobBy consideringthe Entire JobClassificationMethodRankingMethodHay is a Modified Factor Comparison MethodThe Underlying PrincipleAccountabil

7、ityJobs exist to achieve an end resultAccountabilityAccountabilityProblem SolvingTherefore,the job holder requires a level of knowledge and experience commensurate with the scale and complexity of the deliverablesKnow-HowProblem SolvingTo achieve this endresult,job holders must address problems,crea

8、te,analyse and apply judgement132Elements of SizingDepth&Rangeof Know-HowPlanning&OrganisingCommunicating&InfluencingFreedomto ActNature of ImpactArea ofImpact(Magnitude)ThinkingEnvironmentThinkingChallengePROBLEM SOLVINGKNOW-HOWACCOUNTABILITY+=TOTAL SIZEDifferent Types of Evaluation MethodMethod of

9、Comparison UsedMethod of Analysis UsedBy consideringJob ElementsPoint MethodFactor ComparisonMethodComparing JobAgainst SomeScaleComparing JobAgainst JobBy consideringthe Entire JobClassificationMethodRankingMethodHay is a Modified Factor Comparison MethodLEVEL151666645554553353212361515159121212912

10、127711732160272727152121211621211212181243288424242223232322432321818251854512060606030454545344545252525660156396060604660607196496082406015.Emotional effort2.Knowledge,training&experience3.Analytical skills4.Planning and organisation skills5.Physical skills6.Responsibility Patient/client care7.Res

11、ponsibility Policy and service8.Responsibility Financial and physical9.Responsibility Staff/HR leadership,training10.Responsibility Information resources11.Responsibility R&D12.Freedom to act13.Physical effort14.Mental effort1.Communication&relationship skills16.Working conditionsDifferent Types of

12、Evaluation MethodMethod ofComparison UsedMethod of Analysis UsedBy consideringJob ElementsPoint MethodFactor ComparisonMethodComparing JobAgainst SomeScaleComparing JobAgainst JobBy consideringthe Entire JobClassificationMethodRankingMethodHay is a Modified Factor Comparison MethodJob Classification

13、Slot jobs into grades by comparing whole job with a scale in the form of a hierarchy of grade definitionsThe ProcessNumber and characteristics of grades are definedGrade definitions to include factors like skills,experience,accountability Usually only a few grades(differentiation a problem if too ma

14、ny)AXxxxxxxxBXxxxxxxxCXxxxxxxxDXxxxxxxxJob Evaluation Processes and GuidelinesGuidelines in Job EvaluationThe job as it is nowGuidelines in Job EvaluationThe job as it is nowFully acceptable PerformanceGuidelines in Job EvaluationThe job as it is nowFully acceptable PerformanceThe Job&NOT the Person

15、Guidelines in Job EvaluationThe job as it is nowFully acceptable PerformanceThe Job&NOT the PersonAim forConsensusGuidelines in Job EvaluationThe job as it is nowDisregard current pay&statusFully acceptable PerformanceThe Job&NOT the PersonAim forConsensusGuidelines in Job EvaluationThe job as it is

16、 nowDisregard current pay&statusFully acceptable PerformanceThe Job&NOT the PersonNo understanding No EvaluationAim forConsensusJobs Exist In A Contextw Changes to one job affect those around them jobs are intimately related to those around themJob Family Evaluation Process Review BusinessInformatio

17、nEvaluationMethod Job InformationJudgement Record of Reasons Apply Conclusions BusinessInputJob Evaluation and PayThe AllTime Enemy of Job Evaluation.Some factors influencing pay PayProfit ShareDept.PerformanceCompany PerformanceLength of serviceMarketPositioningIndividual PerformanceMarketCompariso

18、nInternal relativityPay“heritage”Job sizeSetting Reward Structures Using JEJOB ANALYSIS Job DescriptionsJOB EVALUATION Process Methodology ResultsREWARD STRUCTURE Number Width PositioningPAY STRUCTURE Policy Practice RangesPAY PROGRESSION Market Positioning Corporate Performance Individual Performan

19、ceSetting Up Reward Structures for Base PayJob Familiesw A job family describes a number of roles which are engaged in a similar or related kind of work.w Job family modelling is a process of work analysis and definition which identifies the levels within a family,and defines accountabilities,perfor

20、mance measures and skills for each level of work.w A completed job family considers how many levels of that type of work there are and describes the key factors which differentiate one level from the next.Using Job Evaluation to Size Job FamiliesEvaluation Scores Job Family Generic Level A Generic L

21、evel B Generic Level C Generic Level D Generic Level EJob Family Levels Accountabilities.Knowledge&Skills.Performance Criteria.Using Job Evaluation to Size Job Families Levels DefinedUsing ChosenEvaluationMethodology JFM 1JFM 2JFM 3 JFM 4 Using Job Evaluation to Set Grading StructuresFinance&ITFinan

22、ce Director Tech MgrSystems MgrFinancial ControllerT,F H&S AsstFinance AdminT,F,H&S Mgr Credit Control MgrFinance AsstSystems AnalystAsst DeveloperIT Support AsstUsing Job Evaluation to Set Grading StructuresFinance&ITFinance Director Tech MgrSystems MgrFinancial ControllerT,F H&S AsstFinance AdminT

23、,F,H&S Mgr Credit Control MgrFinance AsstSystems AnalystAsst DeveloperIT Support AsstUsing Job Evaluation to Set Grading StructuresFinance&ITFinance Director Tech MgrSystems MgrFinancial ControllerT,F H&S AsstFinance AdminT,F,H&S Mgr Credit Control MgrFinance AsstSystems AnalystAsst DeveloperIT Supp

24、ort AsstUsing Job Evaluation For Salary Management010,00020,00030,00040,000050010001500Job Evaluation Rating(e.g.Hay Units)Currently Paid()%JE BenefitsPossible Benefitsw A structured framework for pay and grading w Greater clarity and transparency for employeesw Identify and tackle anomaliesw Improv

25、ed fairness and better equal value protectionw Access to market data to inform cost effective decisions on payPossible Benefits(2)w Sensitive in measuring job differences w Enables comparison of dissimilar jobsw Enables benchmarking against jobs outside the organisation as well as reflecting hierarc

26、hies internallyw Is able to reflect jobs as they change with timew Help to improve recruitment and retention for targeted areas within your businessw Provide clear development pathways for your employeesJE Risks and ConsiderationsPossible Risks Fears that salary costs will rise Administrative/proces

27、s costs rise There is no fit with the strategic agenda There are no positive benefits for stakeholders The organisation takes on too muchImplementation Considerationsw the need for and possible problems in getting union involvementw the need for and problems in getting wider business involvement w t

28、he need to have appeals processes which do provide a safety valve but dont take up a lot of timew the critical nature of communications to successImplementation Considerations(cont)w the requirement to look closely at the new pay policy:what to pay for;the role of increments and the basis for progre

29、ssion etcw the difficulties of getting managers to buy in to a new way of working,and of raising their capability to deal with pay and performance processesw the fact that all this attention to grading and pay will raise expectations,and so the big risk is that change leaves large numbers disappointed.QuestionsContact/Presentation details演讲完毕,谢谢观看!

展开阅读全文
温馨提示:
1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
2: 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
3.本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 装配图网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

copyright@ 2023-2025  zhuangpeitu.com 装配图网版权所有   联系电话:18123376007

备案号:ICP2024067431-1 川公网安备51140202000466号


本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。装配图网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知装配图网,我们立即给予删除!