心理学方面的外文翻译

《心理学方面的外文翻译》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《心理学方面的外文翻译（11页珍藏版）》请在装配图网上搜索。

1、毕业论文（设计）外 文 文 献 翻 译 译文题目：The Science Education Article Cultures学生姓名： 专 业： 指导教师： 2015年1月10日第 11 页 共 11 页 The Science Education Article CulturesLongitudinal Study on Mental Health of University Students: Taking a Finance and Economics University for an Example / Li ZhejunAbstract Objective: To study t

2、he overall situation and trend of freshmens mental health of finance and economics university in recent years. Methods: The University Personality Inventory (UPI) was used to test the 21 492 freshmen during 20092012 in Nan-jing University of Financeand Economics. Results: The mental health of studen

3、ts had a favorable development, the proportion of the students with serious mental health problems was among 6.95%8.38%, the proportion of the students with mental health problems was among 11.99%20.54%. Compared the answers of the key questions,the proportion of yes in boys was significantly higher

4、 than those in girls （ p0.05 ） ,the proprtion of older and younger students was higher than those in normal age （ p0.05）,the pro-prtion of ordinary universities students was higher than those in key university and independent college （ p0.05）, the top 10 mental health problems ware consistent in eac

5、h grade. Conclu-sion: Colleges and universities should be insist in mental health survey in freshmen, improve mental health education, and focus on the groups with problems.Key words collegestudents;mentalhealth;UniversityPersonalityInventory （ UPI）;longitudinal studyTo fully understand the mental h

6、ealth of college students, build students mental file Case, so that psychological problems early detection, early intervention and early treatment, my school from 2009 Since the beginning of newborn psychological online survey to obtain a more comprehensive and accurate The data. To understand the m

7、ental health of college freshmen in recent years, the overall Conditions and trends, this study will feed data 2009-2012 Statistical analysis1 Research Subjects and Methods1.1 Research SubjectsNanjing University of Finance 2009 -2012 years to participate in freshman psychology class 21,492 copies of

8、 census questionnaires for the study. 2009 5014 people, Of which 1691 were boys and girls 3323 people; 2010 5107 people, including boys 1725 people, girls 3382 people; 2011 5774, of whom 1851 were boys, Girls 3923 people; 2012 5597, of whom 1669 were boys and girls 3928 people. The overall age of 15

9、-23 years old.1.2 MethodsUsing Mental Health Personality Questionnaire 1 (University Per-sonality Inventory, UPI) tool for the investigation, the questionnaire contains 64 questions, which The first is the measured pseudo 5,20,35,50 title, the first (61-64) for the secondary theme, the rest 56 quest

10、ions, each question a points score between 0-56 points, the higher the score description heartThe more serious management problems. UPI screening classification criteria are as follows: The first category is satisfying Column one of those conditions: UPI score 25 points; the first 25 questions answe

11、red affirmatively; secondaryThere are at least two problems at the same time make sure to answer questions. The second category is the following conditions One by: score between 20-24 points; the first title to make sure the election 8,16,26 Optional; there is a problem in the secondary question aff

12、irmatively choose. Does not belong to the first and second class were the first Three. The first category may have serious psychological problems, there may be a second class General psychological problems, the third category is the mental health of persons. Heart of the sea using a unified software

13、 online Surveying annually after admission The first two months were a time to complete the assessment within a week. 1.3Statistical AnalysisData were analyzed using SPSS16.0.2 The results2.1 UPI screening overall classification Form 1All grades UPI screening classification resultsA ClassB ClassC Cl

14、assconsulting experienceGrade2009(n=5014)398(7.49%)1030(20.54%)3586(71.52%)35(0.70%)Grade2010(n=5107)428(8.38%)788(15.43%)3891(76.19%)34(0.67%)Grade2011(n=5774)441(7.64%)715(12.38%)4618(79.98%)45(0.78%)Grade2012(n=5597)389(6.95%)671(11.99%)4537(81.06%)35(0.63%)Sum(n=21492)1656(7.71%)3204(14.91%)1663

15、2(77.39%)149(0.69%)As can be seen from Table 1, a class of students screened out at 6.95% distribution rate Between -8.38%, significantly higher than the four years 2010 2012 (p = 0.005), which He was no significant difference between the year of mental health from poor to good for, 2010 Class, 2009

16、, 2011, 2012. II students sieve out ratio There was no significant difference between 2011 and 2012 between 11.99% -20.54% 2009 was significantly higher than that of 2010 (p 0.001), 2010 significantly higher than the 2011 level is explicitly Level (p 0.001). As can be seen, the maximum 2012 freshmen

17、 mental health, The 2009 and 2010 are poor. From consulting experience point of view, four years is not made Health and significant change, had received psychological counseling for students ratio 0.63% -0. Between 78% and less quantity.2.2 Comparison of the total score for each grade UPI Form 2All

18、grades UPI scores of descriptive statisticsGrade2009Grade2010Grade2011GGrade2012MSD 11.4858.521 11.1218.7429.6918.6089.3058.501UPI average and standard score difference of all freshmen in Table 2, comparing the Grade scores are significantly different (F = 81.81, p 0.001), change over time Downward

19、trend of the show.2.3 Key topics differences in gender, age, on admission Form 3Sex differences in analysis of different age groups admission analyze key issuesTItle8 family died in the past and unfortunately16 Often insomnia25 Want to commit suicide26 Lack of interest in anythingComparison Projectx

20、pxpxpxpSex(man or women)18.43505.1230.0243.8990.0485.1930.023Ages(19)20.45907.2750.0267.4510.0243.0930.213Admission line(First/Second/Third)7.320.0261.6450.4390.2160.8976.4250.04Table 3 shows that in the four key questions 8,15,25,26, gender differences Significantly, significantly worse than boys a

21、nd girls. Will be divided into three age groups, less than 18 years For the first group, the normal school age and that is not less than 18 years or less 19 The age of the second group, more than 19 years for the third group, comparing the three age groups Differences in the four questions. In the e

22、ighth title unfortunate, the older age group ( 19 Years old) to be significantly worse than the other two groups; in Question 16 Insomniacs small age group(18 years) was significantly better than the other two groups; in the first 25 questions wanted to commit suicide normal Age group (18-19 years o

23、ld) was significantly better than the other two groups; in the first 26 questions each year There were no significant differences between age groups. Newborn admission can be divided into one, two, Three, to compare the differences in admission in question 4. In the eighth title is Unfortunately, an

24、d the first 26 questions, lack of interest , the two students were significantly worse than one This and three students; 16 and 15 had no significant problems in different online admissionDifferences.2.4 Ranked in the top ten four-issue projectsForm 4 UPI freshmen ranked in the top ten of psychologi

25、cal problemsTitleMake sure to answerQualifyingGrade2009grade2010grade2011grade201261you think relationships are important20783112163Should be responsible for the personal sexual behavior20675221264Premarital sex is acceptable10882333358Care about others sight10069546553It cares for dirty10076455622L

26、ove worry9281667962Loves purpose is to get married90451194452Anything not repeatedly confirmed not assured8929878757Total attention around8732789828Lack of patience803210101110As can be seen from Table 4, between four freshmen reflected the psychological ask Problem is relatively concentrated, a sli

27、ght change in the individual topics, mainly in the love of The purpose of marriage is to increase the number of the affirmative answer, to care about dirty and The number of Love to worry about, the slightly reduced. For secondary question of affirmative response rate is extremely high, 1,2,3,7 were

28、 ranked in the first place.3 Discuss3.1 Freshmen overall mental health statusThrough four years of longitudinal comparative study, UPI screening rates in a class of students Between 6.95% -8.38%, two types of student screening rate of 11.99% -20.54% Room. Compare 2009 with 2010 vertical deviation, t

29、here may be the case with admission Some contact, higher admission line pressure may be more to their students. Previous phase Off The results show that a class of students in the detection rate of 11.35% -21.05%, two Students detection rate of 16.09% -34.09%. Compared speaking, our school a Student

30、s of the detection rate significantly lower detection rate in addition to second-class students than in 2009, Lower than other schools, that I school freshmen mental health break Combined normal 7, and generally benign development. This may exist with students and discipline of a Given relation, my

31、school class for Financial Institutions, students mostly from Jiangsu and Anhui provinces, and more Number of relatively good economic conditions, and not far away from the home accessibility, both for Freshmen psychological adaptation to create a better environment. With the psychological Improve g

32、radually in-depth understanding of the health and attention, and students mental health Is gradually improving. And for a second category of concern is the psychological work of students Carried out as an important part. 3.2 Focus on a few specific groups freshman classFirst, the boys feel unfortuna

33、te past, often insomnia, have suicidal thoughts And the lack of interest rate significantly higher than the number of girls. Financial institutions often Appear in the overall proportion of gender imbalance, showing women more than men and less the case, so Pay attention to the boys mental health is

34、sues is particularly important. Secondly, more than 19 years into the Students learn more feel is unfortunate, and there are more suicide Idea; less than 18 years old enrolled in the sleep better, but the idea of suicide are moreMore. It can be seen in older freshmen may have had unusual people Stud

35、ent experience, such as illness, video and so on, they have a greater psychological shadow Sound, need extra attention; and young freshmen may not mind Cooked, the situation Destructive Enthusiasm, their ideas should also be a teacher understanding and off Note. Finally, two students showed a lack o

36、f interest and more on their own do not feel Fortunately, this can be in the middle ground with them, there are a lot of unknowns in the choice and fans Mang related to education in the daily need to be guided, and gradually cultivate interest And find their own direction.3.3 Focus on several types

37、of psychological concernsComprehensive view of four freshmen year focused psychological problems can be divided into the following several Aspects: first, the interpersonal relationships, relationships that are important to care about him Peoples views, as well as attention to the people around; sec

38、ond, love and sexual aspects, reflecting the Openness and accountability; third, forcing tendency reflected in the dirty really care, repeatedly Confirmation and worry about love; fourth, the lack of patience. When these problems with a strong Generation feature, there is the social environment, fam

39、ily education, a certain relationship, which is to To study also has similar results 6. This is mental health education mention For a basis, but also pointed out the priorities and direction of the work.3.4 Suggestions and StrategiesIn recent years, our school freshman psychology successive census c

40、arried out work for the establishment of Archives and psychology student mental health education provides a rich data support Holders, but also for the psychological problems of students played an important role in prevention. Polytechnic mind To carry out the process for the boys as well as pay att

41、ention to school age is too large or too small new Health and mental health. Widespread problem for college students to carry out psychological Lectures to freshmen universal psychological knowledge, conducted group counseling training to help new Students get along better coordination between heter

42、osexual relationships and the psychological counseling Penetrate into student work, and to let more students to receive counseling, benefit from counseling Consultation. In short, to let in a variety of activities in the students involved, self-discovery Himself, to know themselves, assert themselve

43、s, cultivate good psychological quality.大学生心理健康水平状况纵向研究以某财经大学为例李喆君摘要目的：为了解近年来财经类大学新生的心理健康的总体情况及变化趋势。方法：采用大学生人格问卷（UPI）对南京财经大学2009级2012级新生共计21492人进行测试。结果：学生心理健康状况逐年呈良性健康发展，可能存在严重心理问题的学生占当年入学新生的比率在6.95%8.38%之间，可能存在心理问题的学生比率在11.99%20.54%之间；在关键题项上，男生比率显著高于女生（p0.05），大龄和低龄入学新生比率显著高于正常年龄（p0.05），二本新生比率显著高于一本

44、和三本新生（p0.05）；各级新生排名前10位的心理问题较为一致。结论：要坚持做好新生心理普查工作，并完善心理健康教育的各项工作，对于重点人群给予特别关注。关键词：大学生心理健康UPI纵向研究为全面了解大学生的心理健康状况，建立学生心理档案，做到心理问题的早发现、早干预、早治疗，我校从2009年起开始对新生进行网上心理普查，获得了更加全面准确的数据资料。为了解近年来大学新生心理健康状况的总体情况及变化趋势，本研究将对2009-2012年的数据资料进行统计分析。1 研究对象及方法1.1 研究对象以南京财经大学2009级-2012级历年参加新生心理普查的有效问卷21492份作为研究对象。2009级

45、5014人，其中男生1691人，女生3323人；2010级5107人，其中男生1725人，女生3382人；2011级5774人，其中男生1851人，女生3923人；2012级5597人，其中男生1669人，女生3928人。总体年龄15-23岁。1.2 研究方法采用大学生心理健康人格调查问卷1（University Per-sonality Inventory，UPI）为调查工具，该问卷包含64题，其中第5、20、35、50为测伪题，第61、62、63、64为辅助题，其余的56题，每题1分，总分在0-56分之间，分数越高说明心理问题越严重。UPI的筛查分类标准如下：第一类为满足下列条件之一者：U

46、PI总分25分；第25题作肯定回答；辅助题中同时至少有2题做肯定回答。第二类为满足下列条件之一者：总分介于20-24分之间；第8、16、26 题做肯定选择。辅助题中有1题做肯定选择。不属于第一、二类者为第三类。其中第一类可能存在严重心理问题，第二类可能存在一般心理问题，第三类为心理健康者。用心海软件网上进行统一施测，每年均在入学后的第二个月进行，每次在一周内完成测评。1.3 统计分析采用SPSS16.0对数据进行分析。2 结果2.1UPI筛查分类的总体情况表1各年级UPI筛查分类结果（人数及百分比）一类二类三类2009级(n=5014)398(7.49%)1030(20.54%)3586(71

47、.52%)35(0.70%)2010级(n=5107)428(8.38%)788(15.43%)3891(76.19%)34(0.67%)2011级(n=5774)441(7.64%)715(12.38%)4618(79.98%)45(0.78%)2012级(n=5597)389(6.95%)671(11.99%)4537(81.06%)35(0.63%)总计(n=21492)1656(7.71%)3204(14.91%)16632(77.39%)149(0.69%)从表1可以看出，一类学生的筛出比率分布在6.95%-8.38%之间，四年间2010级显著高于2012级（p=0.005），其他年

48、份之间均无显著差异，心理健康水平从差到好为，2010级、2009级、2011级、2012级。二类学生的筛出比率在11.99%-20.54%之间，2011级与2012级之间无显著差异，2009级显著高于2010级（p0.001）,2010级显著高于2011级（p0.001）可以看出，2012级新生的心理健康水平最高，而2009级和2010级都较差。从咨询经历来看，四年间未发生显著变化，曾经接受过心理咨询的学生比率在0.63%-0.78%之间，数量较少。2.2各年级UPI总分的比较表2 各年级UPI总分的描述统计（MSD）2009级2010级2011级2012级MSD 11.4858.521 11

49、.1218.7429.6918.6089.3058.501各年级新生的UPI总分平均数及标准差见表2，比较各年级分数都存在显著差异（F=81.81，p0.001），随时间的变化呈下降的趋势。2.3关键题目在性别、年龄、录取分数上的差异表3 不同性别、年龄、录取分数人群关键题分数的差异分析关键题目第8题：自己的过去和家庭是不幸的第16题：常常失眠第25题：想轻生第26题：对任何事情都缺乏兴趣比较项xpxpxpxp性别（男/女）18.43505.1230.0243.8990.0485.1930.023年龄段(19)20.45907.2750.0267.4510.0243.0930.213录取线（一

50、本/二本/三本） 7.320.0261.6450.4390.2160.8976.4250.04由表3可见，在8、15、25、26四道关键题上，性别差异均显著，男生显著差于女生。将年龄分成三组，小于18岁的为第一组，正常入学年龄段即大于等于18岁且小于等于19岁的为第二组，大于19岁的为第三组，比较这三个年龄组在4题上的差异。在第8题“不幸的”上，大年龄组（19岁）要显著差于另外两组；在第16题“常失眠”上小年龄组（18岁）要显著好于其他两组；在第25题“想轻生”上正常年龄组（18-19岁）要显著好于他两组；在第26题上各年龄组没有显著差异。新生的录取分数线可分为一本、二本、三本比较不同录取分数

51、线在4题上的差异。在第8题“是不幸的”和第26题“缺乏兴趣”上，本学生都显著差于一本及三本学生；第16和15题在不同录取分数线上均无显著差异。2.4四年中排名前十的问题项目表4 大学新生UPI中排名前十位的心理问题题目做肯定回答的人数排位2009级2010级2011级2012级61你认为人际关系很重要20783112163你认为应该对个人的性行为负责任20675221264你认为婚前性行为是可以接受的10882333358在乎别人视线10069546553 对脏很在乎10076455622爱操心9281667962你认为恋爱的目的是为了婚姻90451194452对任何事情不反复确认就不放心89

52、29878757总注意周围的人8732789828缺乏耐心803210101110由表4可以看出，四年间大学新生所反映出的心理问题相对集中，在个别题目上略有变 化，主要表现在“恋爱的目的是为了婚姻”作肯定回答的人数增加，“对脏很在乎”和“爱操心”的人数略有减少。对于辅助题的肯定回答率极高，分别排在了第1、2、3、7位。 3.讨论 3.1大学新生的心理健康总体状况 通过四年的纵向对比研究，UPI一类学生筛查率在6.95%-8.38%之间，二类学生筛查率在11.99%-20.54%之间。纵向比较2009与2010级偏差，可能与录取分数情况有一定联系，较高的录取线带给学生压力可能更大。以往的相关研究

53、结果显示，一类学生的检出率为11.35%-21.05%，二类学生的检出率为16.09%-34.09%。相比较来说，我校的一类学生检出率明显偏低，二类学生检出率除2009年以外，都较其他学校偏低，说明我校入学新生的心理健康状况符合常态7，且总体呈良性发展。这与生源及学科可能存在一定关系，我校为财经类院校，学生多数来自于苏皖地区，多数经济条件相对较好，并且与家乡距离不远交通方便，都为新生入学的心理适应营造了一个较好的环境。随着对心理健康认识的逐渐深入和关注度的提高，学生心理健康水平也是在逐渐改善的。而针对一、二类学生的关注也是心理工作开展的重要部分。3.2着重关注的几类特殊群体新生首先，男生感觉自

54、己过去不幸、常常失眠、有轻生想法和缺乏兴趣的人数比率明显高于女生。财经类院校往往会出现在总体性别上的比例失调，呈现女多男少的情况，所以要关注男生的心理健康问题尤为重要。其次，大于19岁入学的学生会更多的感到自己是不幸的，并且有更多的轻生想法；小于18岁入学的在睡眠上更好，但轻生的想法也较多。由此可以看出大龄入学的新生可能曾有过不平常的人生经历，比如生病、复读等，对他们的心理产生了较大的影响，需要格外的关注；而低龄入学的新生可能存在心智不成熟、拔苗助长的情况，他们的想法也应得到老师的了解与关注。最后，二本学生表现出更多的缺乏兴趣和对自己感到不幸，这可能与他们处于中间地带，在选择上有很多未知和迷茫

55、有关，在日常的教育中需要加以引导，逐渐地培养兴趣并且找到自己的方向。3.3着重关注的几类心理问题统观4年大学新生集中的心理问题，可以分为如下几个方面：第一，人际关系方面，觉得人际关系很重要，在意他人的看法，以及关注周围的人；第二，恋爱与性方面，体现出开放性与责任感；第三，强迫倾向，体现在对脏很在乎、反复确认以及爱操心；第四，缺乏耐心。这些问题具有较强的时代特征，与社会环境、家庭教育等方面有一定关系，这与以往的研究也有着相类似的结果6。这为心理健康教育工作提供了依据，同时也指出了工作的重点与方向。3.4建议与对策近年来，我校连续开展了新生心理的普查工作，为建立学生心理档案与心理健康教育的开展提供了丰富的数据支持，也为心理问题学生的防范起到了重要的作用。在心理工作的开展过程中要重视男生以及入学年龄过大或过小的新生的心理健康状况。针对大学生普遍存在的问题，开展心理讲座向新生普及心理知识，进行团体心理辅导训练帮助新生更好地协调人际关系以及异性之间的相处，将心理咨询渗透到学生工作之中，让更多地学生接受咨询、受益于咨询。总之，要在形式多样的活动中让学生参与进来，发现自己，认识自己，肯定自己，培养出良好的心理品质。