stratfordonavon district council customer …

上传人:e****s 文档编号:240702142 上传时间:2024-05-01 格式:PPT 页数:56 大小:1.98MB
收藏 版权申诉 举报 下载
stratfordonavon district council customer …_第1页
第1页 / 共56页
stratfordonavon district council customer …_第2页
第2页 / 共56页
stratfordonavon district council customer …_第3页
第3页 / 共56页
资源描述:

《stratfordonavon district council customer …》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《stratfordonavon district council customer …(56页珍藏版)》请在装配图网上搜索。

1、Customer Satisfaction IndexApril 2010RESULTSIntroductionThis report presents the results for the Customer Satisfaction Index survey undertaken in April 2010.The objectives of the research were:For importance,find out our customers requirements and their relative importance For satisfaction,find out

2、our customers perception of our performance To create Priorities for Improvement(to deliver residents satisfaction and build loyalty,organisations must match their performance with residents priorities and these PFIs are an indication of whether this is happening or not).Therefore,PFIs are extremely

3、 useful in deciding where best to focus resources on making the improvements that will contribute most to increasing residents satisfaction.To create a Satisfaction Index(an overall measure of customer satisfaction which can be monitored over time)A standard satisfaction survey just measures residen

4、ts satisfaction with the services an organisation provides.However,a Satisfaction Index survey measures whether it is doing best what matters most to their residents.MethodologyThe first survey of this kind for all public-facing services was undertaken in 2002.By building on this and to establish ho

5、w important or unimportant chosen topic areas were to residents over time,focus groups have been held over the last few years.The first part of the discussions looked at the attendees feelings of satisfaction and dissatisfaction with the Council in various subject areas.The second part of the discus

6、sions concentrated on the relative importance of each of the topic areas to those individuals.It must be recognised that all the topics within the survey are important and in their own right should be priorities for the Council.However,the survey gives the Council a way of ranking these priorities a

7、nd it is these which the Council must look to improve.In this instance,a 10 point scale has been recommended as good practice.A questionnaire was sent to 5000 randomly selected named residents off the edited electoral role.837 questionnaires were returned in the timeframe allowed,in addition 34 were

8、 returned to sender and 10 unwilling to complete it for various reasons.A response rate of 16.9%was achieved.For the comparatively long length of questionnaire,this is an expected response.According to specialists in this field,a return of 15-20%is the norm for this sort of research.On an observed s

9、tatistic of 50%,the standard error of+/-3.3%was achieved in this survey.Summary of Findings(I)Summary of Findings(II)Summary of Findings(III)Summary of Findings(IV)How we calculate the Customer Satisfaction IndexThis example contains 10 requirements for a particular service:Step 1.List all the avera

10、ge importance scores for each requirement and total them up.Step 2.Calculate the percentage each average importance score is of the total of importancescores.This is the“weighted importance score”and adds up to 100%.Step 3.Multiply the average satisfaction scores by the weighted importance scores,i.

11、e.average satisfaction score(6.22)multiplied by weighted importance score(11.01%)equals 0.68.Step 4.Add up the weighted satisfaction scores.Step 5.Multiply the total of the weighted satisfaction scores by 10 to give us the Satisfaction Index expressed as a percentage.When using the 10 point scale fo

12、r satisfaction,7 is regarded as an“acceptable performance”,with 8 and above being the target to be achieved in the future.Overall ResultsFor Each ServiceOVERALL CUSTOMER SATISFACTION INDEX SCORESCOMBINED COUNCIL AVERAGE-ALL RESPONDENTS(02-10)%OVERALL CUSTOMER SATISFACTION INDEX SCORESBY SERVICE-ALL

13、RESPONDENTS(APRIL 2010)Base:(837)COMBINED COUNCIL AVERAGE 2010=73.8%COMBINED COUNCIL AVERAGE 2008=74.3%COMBINED COUNCIL AVERAGE 2006=73.3%SERVICE COMPARISON OF 2010 CSI SCORE VS 2008 CSI SCOREALL RESPONDENTS(difference in%score)OVERALL CUSTOMER SATISFACTION INDEX SCORESCOMBINED COUNCIL AVERAGE-USERS

14、(02-10)%OVERALL CUSTOMER SATISFACTION INDEX SCORESBY SERVICE-USERS(APRIL 2010)COMBINED COUNCIL AVERAGE 2010=71.5%COMBINED COUNCIL AVERAGE 2008=70.4%*=Caution low base sizeSERVICE COMPARISON OF 2010 CSI SCORE VS 2008 CSI SCOREUSERS(difference in%score)*=Caution low base sizeIndividual ResultsBy Servi

15、ce(All Respondents)The results for each service requirement are shown with the worst score first and the best score last.This creates our“Priorities for Improvement”.ACROSS ALL SERVICES 2010(ALL RESPONDENTS)CSI Score for Council in General=73.9%CSI Score for Council Tax=80.7%CSI Score for Environmen

16、tal Health=78.1%CSI Score for Housing=72.0%CSI Score for Leisure Facilities=75.7%CSI Score for Parking=69.1%CSI Score for Parks&Open Spaces=74.3%CSI Score for Planning=66.8%CSI Score for Play Areas=73.0%CSI Score for Public Toilets=72.3%CSI Score for Refuse/Recycling=82.6%CSI Score for Street Cleani

17、ng=73.5%Individual ResultsBy Service(Users of a Service in Last 2 Years)CSI Score for Council in General=73.1%CSI Score for Council Tax=77.8%CSI Score for Environmental Health=70.6%CSI Score for Housing=64.7%CSI Score for Leisure Facilities=74.4%CSI Score for Parking=68.8%CSI Score for Planning=63.0

18、%CSI Score for Play Areas=71.4%CSI Score for Public Toilets=71.6%Overall Views of Council Services(All Respondents)CUSTOMER SATISFACTION INDEXOVERALL SATISFACTION WITH COUNCIL SERVICESALL RESPONDENTS(APRIL 2010)Base:(787)%COMBINED COUNCIL AVERAGE 2010=6.76(Mean Score)COMBINED COUNCIL AVERAGE 2008=6.

19、52(Mean Score)COMBINED COUNCIL AVERAGE 2006=6.62(Mean Score)COMBINED COUNCIL AVERAGE 2004=6.49(Mean Score)COMBINED COUNCIL AVERAGE 2002=6.48(Mean Score)CUSTOMER SATISFACTION INDEXADDITIONAL COMMENTS(APRIL 2010)Base:(269)Mentions 5%or more%APPENDIX A(Respondent Profile)RESPONDENT PROFILE 2010APPENDIX B(Base Sizes)BASE SIZES-IMPORTANCE(I)BASE SIZES-SATISFACTION(II)BASE SIZES-IMPORTANCE(III)BASE SIZES-SATISFACTION(IV)BASE SIZES-IMPORTANCE(V)BASE SIZES-SATISFACTION(VI)BASE SIZES-IMPORTANCE(VII)BASE SIZES-SATISFACTION(VIII)

展开阅读全文
温馨提示:
1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
2: 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
3.本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 装配图网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

copyright@ 2023-2025  zhuangpeitu.com 装配图网版权所有   联系电话:18123376007

备案号:ICP2024067431-1 川公网安备51140202000466号


本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。装配图网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知装配图网,我们立即给予删除!