微观经济学英文课件：ch09 The Analysis of Competitive Markets

《微观经济学英文课件：ch09 The Analysis of Competitive Markets》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《微观经济学英文课件：ch09 The Analysis of Competitive Markets（28页珍藏版）》请在装配图网上搜索。

1、Fernando&Yvonn QuijanoPrepared by:The Analysisof CompetitiveMarkets9C H A P T E RCopyright 2009 Pearson Education,Inc.Publishing as Prentice Hall Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld,8e.Chapter 9:The Analysis of Competitive Markets2 of 28Copyright 2009 Pearson Education,Inc.Publishing as Prentice Hall M

2、icroeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld,8e.CHAPTER 9 OUTLINE9.1 Evaluating the Gains and Losses from Government PoliciesConsumer and Producer Surplus9.2 The Efficiency of a Competitive Market9.3 Minimum Prices9.4 Price Supports and Production Quotas9.5 Import Quotas and Tariffs9.6 The Impact of a Tax or Sub

3、sidyChapter 9:The Analysis of Competitive Markets3 of 28Copyright 2009 Pearson Education,Inc.Publishing as Prentice Hall Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld,8e.EVALUATING THE GAINS AND LOSSESFROM GOVERNMENT POLICIESCONSUMER AND PRODUCER SURPLUS9.1Review of Consumer and Producer SurplusConsumer A would

4、pay$10 for a good whose market price is$5 and therefore enjoys a benefit of$5.Consumer B enjoys a benefit of$2,and Consumer C,who values the good at exactly the market price,enjoys no benefit.Consumer surplus,which measures the total benefit to all consumers,is the yellow-shaded area between the dem

5、and curve and the market price.Consumer and Producer SurplusFigure 9.1Chapter 9:The Analysis of Competitive Markets4 of 28Copyright 2009 Pearson Education,Inc.Publishing as Prentice Hall Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld,8e.EVALUATING THE GAINS AND LOSSESFROM GOVERNMENT POLICIESCONSUMER AND PRODUCER

6、SURPLUS9.1Review of Consumer and Producer SurplusProducer surplus measures the total profits of producers,plus rents to factor inputs.It is the benefit that lower-cost producers enjoy by selling at the market price,shown by the green-shaded area between the supply curve and the market price.Together

7、,consumer and producer surplus measure the welfare benefit of a competitive market.Consumer and Producer Surplus(continued)Figure 9.1Chapter 9:The Analysis of Competitive Markets5 of 28Copyright 2009 Pearson Education,Inc.Publishing as Prentice Hall Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld,8e.EVALUATING THE

8、 GAINS AND LOSSESFROM GOVERNMENT POLICIESCONSUMER AND PRODUCER SURPLUS9.1Application of Consumer and Producer Surplus welfare effects Gains and losses to consumers and producers.The price of a good has been regulated to be no higher than Pmax,which is below the market-clearing price P0.The gain to c

9、onsumers is the difference between rectangle A and triangle B.The loss to producers is the sum of rectangle A and triangle C.Triangles B and C together measure the deadweight loss from price controls.Change in Consumer and Producer Surplus from Price ControlsFigure 9.2 deadweight loss Net loss of to

10、tal(consumer plus producer)surplus.Chapter 9:The Analysis of Competitive Markets6 of 28Copyright 2009 Pearson Education,Inc.Publishing as Prentice Hall Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld,8e.EVALUATING THE GAINS AND LOSSESFROM GOVERNMENT POLICIESCONSUMER AND PRODUCER SURPLUS9.1Application of Consumer a

11、nd Producer SurplusIf demand is sufficiently inelastic,triangle B can be larger than rectangle A.In this case,consumers suffer a net loss from price controls.Effect of Price Controls When Demand Is InelasticFigure 9.3Chapter 9:The Analysis of Competitive Markets7 of 28Copyright 2009 Pearson Educatio

12、n,Inc.Publishing as Prentice Hall Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld,8e.EVALUATING THE GAINS AND LOSSES FROM GOVERNMENT POLICIESCONSUMER AND PRODUCER SURPLUS9.1Supply:QS=15.90+0.72PG+0.05PODemand:QD=10.35 0.18PG+0.69POThe market-clearing price of natural gas is$6.40 per mcf,and the(hypothetical)maximu

13、m allowable price is$3.00.A shortage of 23.6 20.6=3.0 Tcf results.The gain to consumers is rectangle A minus triangle B,and the loss to producers is rectangle A plus triangle C.The deadweight loss is the sum of triangles B plus C.Effects of Natural Gas Price ControlsFigure 9.4Chapter 9:The Analysis

14、of Competitive Markets8 of 28Copyright 2009 Pearson Education,Inc.Publishing as Prentice Hall Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld,8e.THE EFFICIENCY OF A COMPETITIVE MARKET9.2Market FailureThere are two important instances in which market failure can occur:1.Externalities2.Lack of Information economic e

15、fficiency Maximization of aggregate consumer and producer surplus.market failure Situation in which an unregulated competitive market is inefficient because prices fail to provide proper signals to consumers and producers.externality Action taken by either a producer or a consumer which affects othe

16、r producers or consumers but is not accounted for by the market price.Chapter 9:The Analysis of Competitive Markets9 of 28Copyright 2009 Pearson Education,Inc.Publishing as Prentice Hall Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld,8e.THE EFFICIENCY OF A COMPETITIVE MARKET9.2When price is regulated to be no low

17、er than P2,only Q3 will be demanded.If Q3 is produced,the deadweight loss is given by triangles B and C.At price P2,producers would like to produce more than Q3.If they do,the deadweight loss will be even larger.Welfare Loss When Price is Held Above Market-Clearing LevelFigure 9.5Chapter 9:The Analy

18、sis of Competitive Markets10 of 28Copyright 2009 Pearson Education,Inc.Publishing as Prentice Hall Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld,8e.THE EFFICIENCY OF A COMPETITIVE MARKET9.2Supply:QS=16,000+0.4PDemand:QD=32,0000.4PThe market-clearing price is$20,000;at this price,about 24,000 kidneys per year wou

19、ld be supplied.The law effectively makes the price zero.About 16,000 kidneys per year are still donated;this constrained supply is shown as S.The loss to suppliers is given by rectangle A and triangle C.If consumers received kidneys at no cost,their gain would be given by rectangle A less triangle B

20、.The Market for Kidneys and the Effect of the National Organ Transplantation ActFigure 9.6Chapter 9:The Analysis of Competitive Markets11 of 28Copyright 2009 Pearson Education,Inc.Publishing as Prentice Hall Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld,8e.THE EFFICIENCY OF A COMPETITIVE MARKET9.2Supply:QS=16,00

21、0+0.4PDemand:QD=32,0000.4PIn practice,kidneys are often rationed on the basis of willingness to pay,and many recipients pay most or all of the$40,000 price that clears the market when supply is constrained.Rectangles A and D measure the total value of kidneys when supply is constrained.The Market fo

22、r Kidneys and the Effect of the National Organ Transplantation Act(continued)Figure 9.6Chapter 9:The Analysis of Competitive Markets12 of 28Copyright 2009 Pearson Education,Inc.Publishing as Prentice Hall Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld,8e.MINIMUM PRICES9.3Price is regulated to be no lower than Pmi

23、n.Producers would like to supply Q2,but consumers will buy only Q3.If producers indeed produce Q2,the amount Q2 Q3 will go unsold and the change in producer surplus will be A C D.In this case,producers as a group may be worse off.Welfare Loss When Price is Held Above Market-Clearing LevelFigure 9.7C

24、hapter 9:The Analysis of Competitive Markets13 of 28Copyright 2009 Pearson Education,Inc.Publishing as Prentice Hall Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld,8e.MINIMUM PRICES9.3Although the market-clearing wage is w0,firms are not allowed to pay less than wmin.This results in unemployment of an amount L2 L

25、1and a deadweight loss given by triangles B and C.The Minimum WageFigure 9.8Chapter 9:The Analysis of Competitive Markets14 of 28Copyright 2009 Pearson Education,Inc.Publishing as Prentice Hall Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld,8e.MINIMUM PRICES9.3At price Pmin,airlines would like to supply Q2,well a

26、bove the quantity Q1 that consumers will buy.Here they supply Q3.Trapezoid D is the cost of unsold output.Airline profits may have been lower as a result of regulation because triangle C and trapezoid D can together exceed rectangle A.In addition,consumers lose A+B.Effect of Airline Regulation by th

27、e Civil Aeronautics BoardFigure 9.9Chapter 9:The Analysis of Competitive Markets15 of 28Copyright 2009 Pearson Education,Inc.Publishing as Prentice Hall Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld,8e.MINIMUM PRICES9.3TABLE 9.1 Airline Industry Data1975198019851990199520002005 Number of Carriers366310270969490P

28、assenger Load Factor54586162677278Passenger Mile Rate(Constant 1995 dollars).218.210.165.150.129.118.092Real Cost Index(1995=100)10112211110910010193Real Fuel Cost Index(1995=100)249300204163100125237Real Cost Index Corrected for Fuel Cost Changes717388951009667By 1981,the airline industry had been

29、completely deregulated.Since that time,many new airlines have begun service,others have gone out of business,and price competition has become much more intense.Because airlines have no control over oil prices,it is more informative to examine a“corrected”real cost index which removes the effects of

30、changing fuel costs.Chapter 9:The Analysis of Competitive Markets16 of 28Copyright 2009 Pearson Education,Inc.Publishing as Prentice Hall Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld,8e.PRICE SUPPORTS AND PRODUCTION QUOTAS9.4To maintain a price Ps above the market-clearing price P0,the government buys a quantit

31、y Qg.The gain to producers is A+B+D.The loss to consumers is A+B.The cost to the government is the speckled rectangle,the area of which is Ps(Q2 Q1).Prince SupportsFigure 9.10 price support Price set by government above free market level and maintained by governmental purchases of excess supply.Tota

32、l change in welfare:CS+PS Cost to Govt.=D (Q2 Q1)PsPrice SupportsChapter 9:The Analysis of Competitive Markets17 of 28Copyright 2009 Pearson Education,Inc.Publishing as Prentice Hall Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld,8e.PRICE SUPPORTS AND PRODUCTION QUOTAS9.4To maintain a price Ps above the market-cl

33、earing price P0,the government can restrict supply to Q1,either by imposing production quotas(as with taxicab medallions)or by giving producers a financial incentive to reduce output(as with acreage limitations in agriculture).For an incentive to work,it must be at least as large as B+C+D,which woul

34、d be the additional profit earned by planting,given the higher price Ps.The cost to the government is therefore at least B+C+D.Supply RestrictionsFigure 9.11Welfare=A B+A+B+D B C D=B CPrice QuotasCS=A BPS=A C+Payments for not producing(or at least B+C+D)Chapter 9:The Analysis of Competitive Markets1

35、8 of 28Copyright 2009 Pearson Education,Inc.Publishing as Prentice Hall Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld,8e.PRICE SUPPORTS AND PRODUCTION QUOTAS9.41981 Supply:QS=1800+240P1981 Demand:QD=3550 266PTo increase the price to$3.70,the government must buy a quantity of wheat Qg.By buying 122 million bushel

36、s of wheat,the government increased the market-clearing price from$3.46 per bushel to$3.70.The Wheat Market in 1981Figure 9.121981 Total demand:QD=3550 266P+QgQg=506P 1750Qg=(506)(3.70)1750=112 million bushelsLoss to consumers=A B=$624 millionCost to the government=$3.70 x 112 million=$451.4 million

37、Total cost of the program=$624 million+$451.4 million=$1075 millionGain to producers=A+B+C=$638 millionChapter 9:The Analysis of Competitive Markets19 of 28Copyright 2009 Pearson Education,Inc.Publishing as Prentice Hall Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld,8e.PRICE SUPPORTS AND PRODUCTION QUOTAS9.41985

38、 Supply:QS=1800+240P1985 Demand:QD=2580 194PIn 1985,the demand for wheat was much lower than in 1981,because the market-clearing price was only$1.80.To increase the price to$3.20,the government bought 466 million bushels and also imposed a production quota of 2425 million bushels.The Wheat Market in

39、 1985Figure 9.132425 =2580 194P+QgQg=155+194PQg=155+194($3.20)=466 million bushelsCost to the government=$3.20 x 466 million=$1491 millionChapter 9:The Analysis of Competitive Markets20 of 28Copyright 2009 Pearson Education,Inc.Publishing as Prentice Hall Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld,8e.IMPORT Q

40、UOTAS AND TARIFFS9.5In a free market,the domestic price equals the world price Pw.A total Qd is consumed,of which Qs is supplied domestically and the rest imported.When imports are eliminated,the price is increased to P0.The gain to producers is trapezoid A.The loss to consumers is A+B+C,so the dead

41、weight loss is B+C.Import Tariff or Quota That Eliminates ImportsFigure 9.14 import quota Limit on the quantity of a good that can be imported.tariff Tax on an imported good.Chapter 9:The Analysis of Competitive Markets21 of 28Copyright 2009 Pearson Education,Inc.Publishing as Prentice Hall Microeco

42、nomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld,8e.IMPORT QUOTAS AND TARIFFS9.5When imports are reduced,the domestic price is increased from Pw to P*.This can be achieved by a quota,or by a tariff T=P*Pw.Trapezoid A is again the gain to domestic producers.The loss to consumers is A+B+C+D.If a tariff is used,the government

43、 gains D,the revenue from the tariff.The net domestic loss is B+C.If a quota is used instead,rectangle D becomes part of the profits of foreign producers,and the net domestic loss is B+C+D.Import Tariff or Quota(General Case)Figure 9.15Chapter 9:The Analysis of Competitive Markets22 of 28Copyright 2

44、009 Pearson Education,Inc.Publishing as Prentice Hall Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld,8e.IMPORT QUOTAS AND TARIFFS9.5U.S.supply:QS=7.48+0.84PU.S.demand:QD=26.7 0.23PAt the world price of 12 cents per pound,about 23.9 billion pounds of sugar would have been consumed in the United States in 2005,of w

45、hich all but 2.6 billion pounds would have been imported.Restricting imports to 5.3 billion pounds caused the U.S.price to go up by 15 cents.Sugar Quota in 2005Figure 9.16Chapter 9:The Analysis of Competitive Markets23 of 28Copyright 2009 Pearson Education,Inc.Publishing as Prentice Hall Microeconom

46、ics Pindyck/Rubinfeld,8e.IMPORT QUOTAS AND TARIFFS9.5U.S.supply:QS=7.48+0.84PU.S.demand:QD=26.7 0.23PThe gain to domestic producers was trapezoid A,about$1.3 billion.Rectangle D,$795 million,was a gain to those foreign producers who obtained quota allotments.Triangles B and C represent the deadweigh

47、t loss of about$1.2 billion.The cost to consumers,A+B+C+D,was about$3.3 billion.Sugar Quota in 2005(continued)Figure 9.16Chapter 9:The Analysis of Competitive Markets24 of 28Copyright 2009 Pearson Education,Inc.Publishing as Prentice Hall Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld,8e.THE IMPACT OF A TAX OR SU

48、BSIDY9.6Pb is the price(including the tax)paid by buyers.Ps is the price that sellers receive,less the tax.Here the burden of the tax is split evenly between buyers and sellers.Buyers lose A+B.Sellers lose D+C.The government earns A+D in revenue.The deadweight loss is B+C.Incidence of a TaxFigure 9.

49、17 specific tax Tax of a certain amount of money per unit sold.Market clearing requires four conditions to be satisfied after the tax is in place:QD=QD(Pb)(9.1a)QS=QS(Ps)(9.1b)QD=QS(9.1c)Pb Ps=t(9.1d)Chapter 9:The Analysis of Competitive Markets25 of 28Copyright 2009 Pearson Education,Inc.Publishing

50、 as Prentice Hall Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld,8e.THE IMPACT OF A TAX OR SUBSIDY9.6If demand is very inelastic relative to supply,the burden of the tax falls mostly on buyers.Impact of a Tax Depends on Elasticities of Supply and DemandFigure 9.18If demand is very elastic relative to supply,it fa

51、lls mostly on sellers.Chapter 9:The Analysis of Competitive Markets26 of 28Copyright 2009 Pearson Education,Inc.Publishing as Prentice Hall Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld,8e.THE IMPACT OF A TAX OR SUBSIDY9.6A subsidy can be thought of as a negative tax.Like a tax,the benefit of a subsidy is split

52、between buyers and sellers,depending on the relative elasticities of supply and demand.SubsidyFigure 9.19The Effects of a SubsidyConditions needed for the market to clear with a subsidy:QD=QD(Pb)(9.2a)QS=QS(Ps)(9.2b)QD=QS(9.3c)Ps Pb=s(9.4d)subsidy Payment reducing the buyers price below the sellers

53、price;i.e.,a negative tax.Chapter 9:The Analysis of Competitive Markets27 of 28Copyright 2009 Pearson Education,Inc.Publishing as Prentice Hall Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld,8e.THE IMPACT OF A TAX OR SUBSIDY9.6Effect of a$1.00-per-gallon tax:QD=150 25Pb(Demand)QS=60+20Ps(Supply)QD=QS(Supply must

54、equal demand)Pb Ps=1.00(Government must receive$1.00/gallon)150 25Pb=60+20Ps Pb=Ps+1.00150 25Pb=60+20Ps20Ps+25Ps=150 25 6045Ps=65,or Ps=1.44Q=150 (25)(2.44)=150 61,or Q=89 bg/yrAnnual revenue from the tax tQ=(1.00)(89)=$89 billion per yearDeadweight loss:(1/2)x($1.00/gallon)x(11 billion gallons/year

55、=$5.5 billion per yearChapter 9:The Analysis of Competitive Markets28 of 28Copyright 2009 Pearson Education,Inc.Publishing as Prentice Hall Microeconomics Pindyck/Rubinfeld,8e.THE IMPACT OF A TAX OR SUBSIDY9.6Gasoline demand:QD=150 25PGasoline supply:QS=60+20PThe price of gasoline at the pump increases from$2.00 per gallon to$2.44,and the quantity sold falls from 100 to 89 bg/yr.Annual revenue from the tax is(1.00)(89)=$89 billion(areas A+D).The two triangles show the deadweight loss of$5.5 billion per year.Impact of$1 Gasoline TaxFigure 9.20