柠檬市场:质量的不确定性和市场机制(中英对照)

上传人:l** 文档编号:73573913 上传时间:2022-04-11 格式:DOC 页数:14 大小:241KB
收藏 版权申诉 举报 下载
柠檬市场:质量的不确定性和市场机制(中英对照)_第1页
第1页 / 共14页
柠檬市场:质量的不确定性和市场机制(中英对照)_第2页
第2页 / 共14页
柠檬市场:质量的不确定性和市场机制(中英对照)_第3页
第3页 / 共14页
资源描述:

《柠檬市场:质量的不确定性和市场机制(中英对照)》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《柠檬市场:质量的不确定性和市场机制(中英对照)(14页珍藏版)》请在装配图网上搜索。

1、The Markets for “Lemons”: Quality uncertainty and The Market Mechanism柠檬市场:质量的不确定性和市场机制Geogre A。 Akerlof 阿克洛夫一、引言This paper relates quality and uncertainty. The existence of goods of many grades poses interesting and important problems for the theory of markets。(本文论述的是质量和不确定性问题。现实中存在大量多种档次的物品给市场理论提出

2、了饶有趣味而十分重大的难题)On the one hand, the interaction of quality differences and uncertainty may explain important institutions of the labor market。(一方面,质量差异和不确定性的相互作用可以解释劳动力的重要机制)On the other hand, this paper presents a struggling attempt to give structure to the statement: Business in under-developed cou

3、ntries is difficult”; in particular, a structure is given for determining the economic costs of dishonesty。(另一方面,本文试图通过讨论获得这样的结论:在不发达国家,商业交易是困难的,其中,特别论及了欺骗性交易的经济成本)Additional applications of the theory include comments on the structure of money markets, on the notion of ”insurability, on the liquidi

4、ty of durables, and on brand-name goods.(本文的理论还可以用来研究货币市场、保险可行性、耐用品的流动性和名牌商品等问题)There are many markets in which buyers use some market statistic to judge the quality of prospective purchases.(在许多市场中,买者利用市场的统计数据来判断他们将要购买的商品的质量)In this case there is incentive for sellers to market poor quality merchan

5、dise, since the returns for good quality accrue mainly to the entire group whose statistic is affected rather than to the individual seller。 As a result there tends to be a reduction in the average quality of goods and also in the size of the market。(在这种情况下,卖者有动力提供低质量商品,因为某种商品的价格主要取决于所有同类商品质量的统计数据而非

6、该商品的实际质量。结果,商品的平均质量将趋于下降,市场规模将不断缩小)It should also be perceived that in these markets social and private returns differ, and therefore, in some cases, governmental intervention may increase the welfare of all parties。 Or private institutions may arise to take advantage of the potential increases in w

7、elfare which can accrue to all parties.(我们还可以观察到在这种市场上,对个人和社会有不同的回报,因此,某种情况下,政府的干预可以增进社会的总体福利水平。或者说,私人组织利用了整个社会福利水平潜在的增长机会而使自己获利)By nature, however, these institutions are nonatomistic, and therefore concentrations of power with ill consequences of their own-can develop.(实际上,这些私人组织的行动所产生的影响并非可以忽略不计,

8、因此,尽管集权本身有许多负面影响,但是,一定程度上的集权可以保证经济的健康发展)The automobile market is used as a finger exercise to illustrate and develop these thoughts. It should be emphasized that this market is chosen for its concreteness and ease in understanding rather than for its importance or realism.(下面,我们用汽车市场作为例子来阐释和进一步发展以上的

9、思想。需要指出的是,之所以选择旧车市场来讨论,是因为这个例子很具体,并且容易理解,而不是因为它的重要性和有何现实意义)二、以汽车市场模型为例(一)汽车市场The example of used cars captures the essence of the problem。 From time to time one hears either mention of or surprise at the large price difference between new cars and those which have just left the showroom. The usual l

10、unch table justification for this phenomenon is the pure joy of owning a ”new” car。(旧车市场的例子可以抓住问题的本质。人们不止一次的听说或惊讶于新车与刚刚开出样品陈列室的汽车之间的价格存在巨大差别。对于这种情况最普遍的解释是人们有一种对“新”车的特别偏好)We offer a different explanation。 Suppose (for the sake of clarity rather than reality) that there are just four kinds of cars。 Th

11、ere are new cars and used cars. There are good cars and bad cars (which in America are known as lemons”). A new car may be a good car or a lemon, and of course the same is true of used cars。(假设(作出这种假设只是为了简化分析,而非从实际出发)用四种汽车:新车和旧车;高质量的车和低质量的车(低质量的车在美国被称为“柠檬”)。一辆新车可能是高质量的,也可能是“柠檬”,当然一辆旧车也同样有两种情况)The in

12、dividuals in this market buy a new automobile without knowing whether the car they buy will be good or a lemon。 But they do know that with probability q it is a good car and with probability (1q) it is a lemon; by assumption, q is the proportion of good cars produced and (1 q) is the proportion of l

13、emons.(在这样的市场上,消费者买新车时并不知道车辆到底是高质量的还是“柠檬”,但是他知道这辆车是高质量的概率是q,是“柠檬”的概率是“1-q.这里假设q是高质量车占所有汽车的比率,1-q是“柠檬”的比率)After owning a specific car, however, for a length of time, the car owner can form a good idea of the quality of this machine; i。e., the owner assigns a new probability to the event that his car

14、is a lemon。 This estimate is more accurate than the original estimate。(车主在拥有汽车后一段时间内就会了解到该车的质量,也就是说,此时车主可以赋予该车可能是“柠檬的一个概率值,这个估计比初始的估计更加准确)An asymmetry in available information has developed: for the sellers now have more knowledge about the quality of a car than the buyers。 But good cars and bad car

15、s must still sell at the same price since it is impossible for a buyer to tell the difference between a good car and a bad car.(于是,信息不对称发生了:卖主掌握了比买主更多的关于汽车质量的信息。对于买主来说,由于他不能在买车时区分汽车的质量,所以,高质量车和低质量车只能以同一个价格水平出售)It is apparent that a used car can-not have the same valuation as a new car if it did have

16、 the same valuation, it would clearly be advantageous to trade a lemon at the price of new car, and buy another new car, at a higher probability q of being good and a lower probability of being bad。(显然,一辆新车和一辆旧车不应该有相同的评价。如果他们拥有相同的评价,车主通过以高质量车的价格出售“柠檬后再买一辆新车,该新车是高质量的概率q大于原先购买新车的概率)Thus the owner of a

17、 good machine must be locked in。 Not only is it true that he cannot receive the true value of his car, but he cannot even obtain the expected value of a new car.(这样,高质量车的拥有者将不会卖出汽车,因为如果卖出汽车他不仅无法得到汽车的真实价值,也无法获得一辆新车的期望价值)Greshams law has made a modified reappearance. For most cars traded will be the ”

18、lemons,” and good cars may not be traded at all。 The bad cars tend to drive out the good (in much the same way that bad money drives out the good)。(这里出现了一个修正后的格莱欣定律。当“柠檬”充斥汽车市场时,高质量车根本不会成交,于是,如同劣币驱逐良币一样,低质量车将高质量车逐出市场)But the analogy with Greshams law is not quite complete: bad cars drive out the goo

19、d because they sell at the same price as good cars; similarly, bad money drives out good because the exchange rate is even。(然而,该结果与格莱欣定律并不完全一样:低质量车驱逐高质量车是因为低质量车和高质量车在相同的价格水平上出售。相似地,劣币驱逐良币是因为两者的交换利率相同)But the bad cars sell at the same price as good cars since it is impossible for a buyer to tell the

20、difference between a good and a bad car; only the seller knows. In Greshams law, however, presumably both buyer and seller can tell the difference between good and bad money. So the analogy is instructive, but not complete.(但是低质量车之所以与高质量以同一个价格出售是因为买主无法区分一辆车到底是低质量的还是高质量的,这只有卖主才知道的信息。在格莱欣定律中,买主和卖主大概否可

21、以区分劣币和良币。所以说,这个类比具有启发性,但非完全相同)(二)非对称信息It has been seen that the good cars may be driven out of the market by the lemons。 But in a more continuous case with different grades of goods, even worse pathologies can exist.(我们已经看到质量好的汽车会被“柠檬”逐出市场。但是,在不同质量等级的产品连续分布的情形下,更糟糕的情况也会发生)For it is quite possible to

22、 have the bad driving out the notsobad driving out the medium driving out the not-so-good driving out the good in such a sequence of events that no market exists at all。(质量最差的汽车在将质量最好的汽车逐出市场后,会继续将质量较好、质量中等和质量稍差的汽车依次逐出市场,从而导致二手车交易市场根本无法存在)One can assume that the demand for used automobiles depends mo

23、st strongly upon two variables - the price of the automobile p and the average quality of used cars traded, , or Qd = D(p, )。(假设对二手车的需求主要取决于两个变量二手车的价格p和进入交易的二手车的平均质量,即Qd = D(p, )Both the supply of used cars and also the average quality will depend upon the price, or =(p) and S=S(p)。(而二手车的供给和平均质量都取决于

24、二手车的价格,即=(p) 和S=S(p)And in equilibrium the supply must equal the demand for the given average quality, or S(p) = D (p, (p). As the price falls, normally the quality will also fall. And it is quite possible that no goods will be traded at any price level.(在均衡状态下对于给定的平均质量,二手车的需求等于供给,即S(p) = D (p, (p)。

25、随着二手车交易价格下降,进入交易的二手车的平均质量当然也随之降低,最终导致在任何价格水平下都不存在二手车交易)Such an example can be derived from utility theory。 Assume that there are just two groups of traders: groups one and two。 Give group one a utility function:(效用理论可以用开帮助我们解释二手车市场的例子.假定市场上有两类交易者,交易者1和交易者2,交易者1的效用函数为)Where M is the consumption of go

26、ods other than automobiles, is the quality of the th automobile, and n is the number of automobiles。(其中,M代表交易者1对二手车之外其他商品的消费,的质量,n为汽车的数量)Similarly, let(同理,交易者2的效用函数是)Three comments should be made about these utility functions:(对于这些效用函数有三点需要说明)(1) without linear utility (say with logarithmic utility)

27、 one gets needlessly mired in algebraic complication(第一,这里采用线性效用函数(如对数效用函数)来讨论问题,这样我们就无需处理复杂的代数运算)(2) The use of linear utility allows a focus on the effects of asymmetry of information; with a concave utility function we would have to deal jointly with the usual risk-variance effects of uncertainty

28、 and the special effects we wish to discuss here.(第二,现行效用函数还能让我们专注于对非对称信息的效果.如果在凹形效用函数下进行研究,我们将不得不在考察我们最希望关注的事实的同时,考虑不确定性所带来的风险变动的影响)(3) U1 and U2 have the odd characteristic that the addition of a second car, or indeed a kth car, adds the same amount of utility as the first。 Again realism is sacrif

29、iced to avoid a diversion from the proper focus。(第三,U1和U2具有边际效用不变的特征,即增加第二辆车的消费所带来的效用的增加都与增加第一辆车消费所带来的效用增加相等。在此,我们再一次为了研究的需要牺牲了边际效用变动的现实)To continue, it is assumed (1) that both type one traders and type two traders are Von NeumannMorgenstern maximizers of expected utility; (接下来假设:(1)两类消费者都是冯。诺依曼摩根斯

30、坦效用函数中的追求期望效用最大化者)(2) that group one has N cars with uniformly distributed quality , , and groupt wo has no cars;(2)交易者1拥有N辆质量为并且服从均匀分布的汽车,其中,交易者2没有汽车)(3) that the price of ”other goods M is unity.((3)把其他商品M的价格看成为一个单位)Denote the income (including that derived from the sale of automobiles) of all typ

31、e one traders as Y1 and the income of all type two traders as Y2.(把各种类型的交易者1的收入(包括销售二手汽车所带来的收入)记作Y1,将交易者2的收入记为Y2)The demand for used cars will be the sum of the demands by both groups。 When one ignores indivisibilities, the demand for automobiles by type one traders will be(对二手车的需求即是两类交易者对二手车需求的总和。当

32、我们忽略不可整除的可能时,交易者1对二手车需求的数量可以表示为)And the supply of cars offered by type one traders is(交易者1对二手车的供给是)With average quality(二手车的平均质量为)(To derive (1) and (2), the uniform distribution of automobile quality is used.)(在(1)和(2)两个表达式中,我们使用了二手车质量服从均匀分布这一假设)Similarly the demand of type two traders is (同样,交易者2的

33、需求为)And(供给是)Thus total demand D (p, u) is (因此,总需求D (p, u)是)However, with price p, average quality is p/2 and therefore at no price will any trade take place at all: in spite of the fact that at any given price between 0 and 3 there are traders of type one who are willing to sell their automobiles at

34、 a price which traders of type two are willing to pay。(尽管有这样的事实,即在0到3之间的某个价格下有的交易者1愿意卖掉他们的车,而有的交易者2愿意在这一价格下购买.但无论如何,在价格为p,平均质量为p/2这种质量均匀分布的情形中,在任何价格水平下都根本不会发生二手车交易)(三)对称信息The foregoing is contrasted with the case of symmetric information。 Suppose that the quality of all cars is uniformly distributed

35、,。 Then the demand curves and supply curves can be written as follows:(上面的分析将与对称信息下的情形形成对照.假设所有汽车的质量是均匀分布的,。那么,供给曲线和需求曲线就可以写成如下形式:)Supply(供给曲线是)S(p)=N p1S(p)=0 p1And the demand curves are(需求曲线是)D(p)=(Y1+Y2)/p p1D(p)=(Y2/p) 13/2In equilibrium(均衡时)P=1 如果Y2N (3)P=Y2/N 如果2Y2/3NY2 (4)p=3/2 如果N2Y2/3 (5)If

36、 N Y2 there is a gain in utility over the case of asymmetrical information of N/2. (If NY2, in which case the income of type two traders is insufficient to buy all N automobiles, there is a gain in utility of Y2/2 units。)(如果N Y2,那么没在非对称信息的情况下有N/2单位的效用收益。如果NY2,此时交易者2的收入不足以购买到N辆汽车,那么,将有Y2/2单位的效用收益)Fin

37、ally, it should be mentioned that in this example, if traders of groups one and two have the same probabilistic estimates about the quality of individual automobiles though these estimates may vary from automobile to automobile (3), (4), and (5) will still describe equilibrium with one slight change

38、: p will then represent the expected price of one quality unit。(最后,对于该例子应该提到的是,如果两类交易者对每辆汽车的质量具有相同的概率估计尽管这种估计因汽车的不同而不同(3)、(4)和(5)仍将能描述均衡,只不过此时p将代表每单位质量的期望价格)三、例证和应用(一)保险It is a wellknown fact that people over 65 have great difficulty in buying medical insurance. The natural question arises: why does

39、nt the price rise to match the risk? (总所周知,年龄超过65岁的人很难买到医疗保险。这就产生了一个问题:为什么保险费不能一直上升到风险相当的水平?)Our answer is that as the price level rises the people who insure themselves will be those who are increasingly certain that they will need the insurance; for error in medical check-ups, doctors sympathy wit

40、h older patients, and so on make it much easier for the applicant to assess the risks involved than the insurance company。(我们的回答是,当保险费提高时,只有那些越来越确信自己有必要投保的人才会买保险。医疗体检中的弊端、医生对病人的同情等因素,使得保险申请人比保险公司更加了解自己的风险状况)The result is that the average medical condition of insurance applicants deteriorates as the

41、price level rises -with the result that no insurance sales may take place at any price.(结果,当保险费上升时,投保申请人的平均健康状况不断恶化,导致最终将不会在任何保险费水平上签订保险合同)This is strictly analogous to our automobiles case, where the average quality of used cars supplied fell with a corresponding fall in the price level. This agree

42、s with the explanation in insurance textbooks:(这与我们汽车市场的例子十分相似,在那里,待售旧车的平均质量随着市场价格的下降而下降。关于这一点,保险学教科书的解释是这样:)Generally speaking policies are not available at ages materially greater than sixtyfive。.。 The term premiums are too high for any but the most pessimistic (which is to say the least healthy)

43、insureds to find attractive. Thus there is a severe problem of adverse selection at these ages。(通常,65岁以上人的保单是无效的。此时,保险费太高以至于除了那些最悲观的(即健康状况最差的)投保人而没有其他人会对投保感兴趣,因而在这一年龄存在着严重的逆向选择问题)The statistics do not contradict this conclusion。 While demands for health insurance rise with age, a 1956 national sampl

44、e survey of 2,809 families with 8,898 persons shows that hospital insurance coverage drops from 63 per cent of those aged 45 to 54, to 31 per cent for those over 65.(以上结论与统计数据是一致的.1956年对2809个家庭8898个人进行的全国性调查问卷显示,当人们随着年龄的增长越来越需要保险时,医疗保险的覆盖率从4565岁人群的63%下降到65岁以上人群的31)And surprisingly, this survey also

45、finds average medical expenses for males aged 55 to 64 of 88, while males over 65 pay an average of $77。(令人吃惊的是,调查显示,5564岁之间男性的平均医疗支出是88美元,超过65岁男性的该项支出是77美元)While noninsured expenditure rises from $66 to $80 in these age groups, insured expenditure declines from 105 to $70。(然而,在该年龄段的人的非保险支出从66美元上升到8

46、0美元,保险支出则从105美元下降到70美元)The conclusion is tempting that insurance companies are particularly wary of giving medical insurance to older people.(结论是饶有趣味的:保险公司对向老人提供保险尤为谨慎)The principle of ”adverse selection” is potentially present in all lines of insurance。 The following statement appears in an insuran

47、ce textbook written at the Wharton School:(逆向选择问题是所有类型的保险都存在的普遍问题.下面的观点摘自沃顿商学院的一本教科书:)There is potential adverse selection in the fact that healthy term insurance policy holders may decide to terminate their coverage when they become older and premiums mount.(当逐渐变老的那些健康保险的投保人面对保费上升时,他们就有可能决定退出保险,这种情

48、况中便存在潜在的逆向选择)This action could leave an insurer with an undue proportion of below average risks and claims might be higher than anticipated.(这一行动能使保险公司的客户中高风险客户所占比例过高,而使保险公司可能支付比预期要高的赔偿金额)Adverse selection ”appears (or at least is possible) whenever the individual or group insured has freedom to buy

49、 or not to buy, to choose the amount or plan of insurance, and to persist or to discontinue as a policy holder。(当保险个人或团体能自由选择购买或不买保险,能都自由选择保险金和保险计划,自由选择维持保险或中断保险时,逆向选择便会出现,或至少可能存在逆向选择)Group insurance, which is the most common form of medical insurance in the United States, picks out the healthy, for

50、 generally adequate health is a precondition for employment. (团体保险是美国医疗保险中最普遍的保险形式,它用于鉴别人们的健康状况,因为通常情况下,健康是被雇佣的一个先决条件)At the same time this means that medical insurance is least available to those who need it most, for the insurance companies do their own adverse selection。”(同时,这意味着保险公司自身的逆向选择行动可能使那

51、些最需要保险的人轻易得到保险)This adds one major argument in favor of medicare.(医疗保险市场上的逆向选择现象为支持政府医疗保障方案提供了一个主要论据)On a cost benefit basis medicare may pay off: for it is quite possible that every individual in the market would be willing to pay the expected cost of his medicare and buy insurance, yet no insuranc

52、e company can afford to sell him a policy for at any price it will attract too many ”lemons。(通过成本收益分析,我们可以看到医疗保障是值得的,因为很有可能市场上所有人都希望付出一定的医疗保险的期望成本来购买保险,但却没有保险公司愿意出售保单,因为无论在那个价格水平下,保险合同的购买中都会有太多“柠檬”)The welfare economics of medicare, in this view, is exactly analogous to the usual classroom argument

53、for public expenditure on roads。(从这一方面来看,对医疗保障方案的经济分析与平常我们关于政府利用公共支出建设马路的讨论十分相似)(二)少数名族就业The Lemons Principle also casts light on the employment of minorities。 Employers may refuse to hire members of minority groups for certain types of jobs。(柠檬原则还能用来解释少数民族就业问题.雇主可能在某些职位上不愿意雇佣少数名族的职员)This decision m

54、ay not reflect irrationality or prejudice -but profit maximization. For race may serve as a good statistic for the applicants social background, quality of schooling, and general job capabilities。(这种决策并非是带有成见或者歧视,而是追求利润最大化的结果。对于求职者的社会背景和工作能力,种族可以是一个很好的统计指标)Good quality schooling could serve as a sub

55、stitute for this statistic; by grading students the schooling system can give a better indicator of quality than other more superficial characteristics。(高质量的教育水平可以用来作为该统计指标的一个补充,教育系统通过区分学生来作为一个比其他表面特征更优越的显示信号)As T. W。 Schultz writes, The educational establishment discovers and cultivates potential t

56、alent. The capabilities of children and mature students can never be known until found and cultivated.” (Italics added。)(正如舒尔茨所写的那样“兴办教育能够发觉和培养潜在的天才,儿童和成人的才能如果不经发掘和培养将不会被知晓)An untrained worker may have valuable natural talents, but these talents must be certified by ”the educational establishment be

57、fore a company can afford to use them。 The certifying establishment, however, must be credible; the unreliability of slum schools decreases the economic possibilities of their students.(虽然一名未受过教育的工人可能具有十分有价值的才能,但是在公司决定雇佣他之前,这些才能必须经过教育系统的证明.无论如何,这种起到证明作用的系统应该是可信的,贫民区学校的低的证明能力相应地低估了学生的经济潜力)This lack m

58、ay be particularly disadvantageous to members of already disadvantaged minority groups. For an employer may make a rational decision not to hire any members of these groups in responsible positions- because it is difficult to distinguish those with good job qualifications from those with bad qualifi

59、cations。(教育上的缺陷使已经是弱势群体的少数民族更加不理。因为难以区分少数民族中工作能力高和工作能力低的职员,雇主的理智选择是在责任重大的岗位上不雇佣少数民族的工人)This type of decision is clearly what George Stigler had in mind when he wrote, in a regime of ignorance Enrico Fermi would have been a gardener, Von Neumann a checkout clerk at a drugstore。(这种决策早已清晰地反映在乔治。斯蒂格利茨的思

60、想中,他写道:“如果没有接受教育,恩莱科。费米可能只是个花匠,而冯。诺依曼则可能是商店里的一名检验员”)As a result, however, the rewards for work in slum schools tend to accrue to the group as a whole in raising its average quality rather than to the individual.(无论如何,贫民区的学校的工作不仅可以使那里受教育的个人收益,还能通过提高人们的平均素质增加对整个社会群体的回报)Only insofar as information in a

61、ddition to race is used is there any incentive for training。(仅从教育水皮可以作为种族的附加信息这个角度来说,人们是用动机接受教育的)An additional worry is that the Office of Economic Opportunity is going to use costbenefit analysis to evaluate its programs. For many benefits may be external.(我们的另一个但有就是企业一直用成本收益分析法来评价他们的项目优劣,因为这种方法可能忽

62、略许多外部性)The benefit from training minority groups may arise as much from raising the average quality of the group as from raising the quality of the individual trainee; and, likewise, the returns may be distributed over the whole group rather than to the individual。(对少数民族群体进行培训的好处在于它提高个人素质的同时,也提高了整体群

63、体的平均素质。同样,这种回报并不单单在个体间得到分配,而且使得整个群体受益)(三)欺骗性交易的成本The Lemons model can be used to make some comments on the costs of dishonesty. Consider a market in which goods are sold honestly or dishonestly; quality may be represented, or it may be misrepresented。(柠檬模型也可以用于解释欺骗性交易的成本。假设,在市场上货物买卖或是诚实地进行或是带有欺骗性的进行

64、,即质量可能是被真是标记,也可能是被虚假标记)The purchasers problem, of course, is to identify quality。 The presence of people in the market who are willing to offer inferior goods tends to drive the market out of existence as in the case of our automobile lemons.”(买者的困难就是确定质量。那些在是市场上提供次品的人就像二手车市场上的柠檬一样会使得整个市场瓦解)It is th

65、is possibility that represents the major costs of dishonesty - for dishonest dealings tend to drive honest dealings out of the market。(这种可能性构成了欺骗性交易的成本,即欺骗性交易将诚实的交易者逐出市场)There may be potential buyers of good quality products and there may be potential sellers of such products in the appropriate price range, however, the presence of people who wish to pawn bad wares as good wares tends to drive out the legitimate business.(市场上原本可能有买主想购买高质量

展开阅读全文
温馨提示:
1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
2: 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
3.本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 装配图网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

copyright@ 2023-2025  zhuangpeitu.com 装配图网版权所有   联系电话:18123376007

备案号:ICP2024067431-1 川公网安备51140202000466号


本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。装配图网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知装配图网,我们立即给予删除!