PART 1 – PUBLIC DOCUMENT - North Hertfordshire.docx

《PART 1 – PUBLIC DOCUMENT - North Hertfordshire.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《PART 1 – PUBLIC DOCUMENT - North Hertfordshire.docx（8页珍藏版）》请在装配图网上搜索。

1、PART 1 - PUBLIC DOCUMENTAGENDA ITEM No.8TITLE OF REPORT: BALDOCK PARKING REVIEWREPORT OF THE CORPORATE MANAGER FOR STRATEGIC PLANNING & ENTERPRISETHE ATTACHED REPORT IS A LATE ADDITION TO THE BALDOCK AND DISTRICT AGENDA FOR THE MEETING ON 14 JUNE 2010.TimelineTasksOctober Analyse responses and final

2、ise schemeNovember Update Baldock & District Committee Commence draft TROsNovember/December Finalise draft TROs Advertise TROs (21 days minimum)December/January/February Consider ObjectionsFebruary Modifications/Signed & Sealed TROs Notice of Made Order (within 14 days of sealing)February/March 6 we

3、ek High Court Challenge period on TRO processMay 2011 Implement lines/signsPART 1 - PUBLIC DOCUMENTAGENDA ITEM No.8TITLE OF REPORT: BALDOCK PARKING REVIEWREPORT OF THE CORPORATE MANAGER FOR STRATEGIC PLANNING & ENTERPRISE1. PURPOSE OF REPORTTo seek Members agreement to the scope and indicative progr

4、amme (See Appendix 1) for progressing the town-wide review of parking for Baldock, including parking related issues arising from the Baldock Town Centre Enhancement (TCE) scheme.1.1 This report will form part of a series of reports to come before Members as the review process progresses.2. FORWARD P

5、LANThis Report contains a key recommendation that was first notified to the public in the forward Plan on 1st June 2007 in terms of the Baldock Town Centre Strategy and on 1st June 2009 for the NHDC Car Parking Strategy Review.3. BACKGROUNDAt its meeting in March 2010 the Area Committee considered a

6、 report on a number of matters for consideration following completion of the TCE scheme. Several of these issues were parking related and the Committee resolved to include some of the issues in the town-wide Parking Review for Baldock.3.1 The other TCE review issues listed in the report to the Area

7、Committee in March relating to scheme design and traffic management are under investigation and will be the content of an updated report to the Committee in July.3.2 In addition to the TCE review, the Parking Strategy for the district sets the policy for parking management. The Parking Strategy Acti

8、on Plan sets out that there will be a review of parking in Baldock in 2010/11. The review is in part to cover the outstanding TCE issues and in part to cover some longer standing issues related, in the main, to non-residential parking in residential areas.3.3 The parking issues arising from the TCE

9、and agreed for further consideration by the Area Committee can be summarised as follows: Re-location of the loading bay in Church StreetDesign and layout of Disabled Bays in Whitehorse Street and outside Costcutter in High Street The need for a town wide parking review with specific reference to Chu

10、rch Street, Thurnall Close and The Twitchell. Several other roads will also need attention (see 3.5)The overnight lorry ban in Baldock needs to be re-instated and enforced.3.4 In addition to the TCE, officers have been monitoring requests for parking management over a period of time from a number of

11、 sources. The following summarises this demand, based on basic zonal demarcations (no order of preference is suggested at this stage): Zone 1: The Twitchell, Thurnall Close, Simpson Drive. Possibly including Clothall Road. Issues are likely to be a result of long stay parking displacing after TCE co

12、mpletion. This zone also includes the Twitchell off-street car park (see 3.8). Zone 2: Church Street, Football Close, Jackson Street, Icknield Way area. Issues are likely to be a result of long stay parking displacing post TCE and also long standing rail commuter parking mixed with insufficient priv

13、ate off-street parking for residents and relatively narrow streets. Zone 3: Bygrave Road, Salisbury Road, Larkins Close area. Issues in this area are likely to be a result of rail commuter parking. Zone 4: Mansfield Road, Park Drive, Holroyd Crescent area. Parking issues in this area are likely to b

14、e long stay parking after TCE mixed with residents competing for space due to insufficient off-street parking. Possibly extending into Weston Way.3.5 The Committee will no doubt be aware of the potential for parking issues to migrate. Other zones that may be under existing or future pressures could

15、include: Zone 5: The Tene, Pinnocks Lane, Pembroke Road area. Probably town centre related parking, mixed with residents competing for onstreet space. Zone 6: Limekiln Lane, Providence Way area. Displacement of town centre long stay parking mixed with school parking and relatively narrow roads. Zone

16、 7: Grosvenor Road, Sale Drive, Stane Street or more generally, the western and southern edges of Clothall Common. Displacement of rail commuters and/or employees of business on west side of Royston road. Also possible competition with residents where off- street parking is insufficient.3.6 The Comm

17、ittees views on the issues and areas set out in 3.4 - 3.6 would be welcomed. In particular officers would welcome feedback on parking issues that may have been reported to Members by residents and businesses.3.7 The Councirs Corporate Business Planning for 2010/11 allows for introducing Pay and Disp

18、lay (P&D) to the Twitchell car park. Currently this car park is free of charge with no restriction on duration of stay. Informal observations suggests that it is used by town centre employees and possibly rail commuters.4. ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATIONThe issues set out above fall into three broad catego

19、ries although there are clear overlaps. Category 1 includes minor TCE improvements, category 2 includes existing issues and category 3 includes potential issues.4.1 Of the category 1 issues, see paragraph 3.4 above, a swept path analysis was undertaken as part designing the junction of Sun Street an

20、d Church Street when pedestrianising the southern end of Church Street during the TCE. This analysis will be used when considering the option for relocating the loading bay further northwards along Church Street in conjunction with on street parking restrictions for this area. The design of the disa

21、bled parking bays will be investigated as part of this work and if found not to meet the required standard will be amended accordingly. Work is progressing on other areas in terms of lines and signs maintenance and their reinstatement through the district. The over-night lorry ban is included in thi

22、s work and will be progressed this financial year.4.2 At this stage it is not intended to identify any potential solutions for category 2 issues, i.e. those zones listed in paragraph 3.5 above, but the Council has, traditionally, dealt with non-residential parking issues in residential areas by impl

23、ementing Controlled Parking Zones (CPZ).4.3 Whilst CPZs have successfully removed non-residents, relatively low permit take up means that this type of scheme is expensive to run. Until more survey and consultation work is undertaken and more information is available on residents5 parking requirement

24、s, it is difficult to begin to identify solutions for the areas identified above. There is also the option to possibly include commuter parking permits in CPZs. The numbers would have to be carefully managed. This option could be investigated as part of the initial survey and consultation work as ou

25、tlined in the indicative programme attached at Appendix 1.4.4 It is unlikely that there will be sufficient resources to deliver parking management for category 3 issues, i.e. those zones listed in paragraph 3.6 above. In addition it has traditionally been difficult to secure support of residents for

26、 measures where there currently may not be a significant parking problem created by non-residents.4.5 Members are asked to give particular consideration to those areas of Baldock that should be included in the parking review, bearing in mind the limitation on resources.4.6 With regard to The Twitche

27、ll car park as it would be the first chargeable parking in Baldock and there are existing on-street parking issues in the vicinity. Careful consideration needs to be given to the impact charging may have.4.7 With free up to 2 hours or longer on-street parking available in the town centre there would

28、 not appear to be a clear case for charging for up to 1 or 2 hours as per other car parks or a need for a short stay off street car park. The Twitchell does serve a long stay purpose at the moment and there may be demand for medium stay for part-time workers or those with longer appointments in the

29、town centre. At this stage, therefore, it is suggested that charging for *up to 3 hours and all day form the basis for the Twitchell tariff.4.8 Introducing charging in the Twitchell car park will almost certainly displace parking but it is considered that this can be minimised by, firstly, ensuring

30、the tariffs are reasonable, secondly, timing on-street parking controls to be implemented alongside car park charges and thirdly, there is some spare capacity at the south end of High Street for some displacement, albeit this may be under pressure from any on street parking controls that may be impl

31、emented in the vicinity of the Twitchell. Reference is also made to the 30 businesses parking spaces that have been secured to be provided at an agreed location on the Tesco site prior to works commencing as part of the planning conditions for the recent Tesco Store development.4.9 At this stage the

32、 review does not intend to cover any significant changes to on street parking within the TCE area (i.e. reducing number of spaces and/or duration of stay, charging for on street parking or increasing the number of resident permit parking bays). Should these issues be considered then the role of the

33、Twitchell car park would need to be reviewed.4.10 There is also a need to consider the management of the community centre car park adjacent to the Twitchell. At this stage it is suggested that the Community Centre be for users only and a permit system be introduced with the Community Centre responsi

34、ble for managing the permits.4.11 Appendix 1 sets out the programme outline for the review. It is worth noting that timescales are tight and it is intended that the Area Committee is included in consultation during the process. Any proposals are not intended to be finalised until November.4.12 There

35、 are effectively three stages of consultation 一 July for background information gathering and initial views on how to deal with any problems, September for scheme options and November/December for advertising Traffic Regulation Orders (TROs). In all cases 3 weeks has been allowed. The July and Septe

36、mber consultations could be shortened to 2 weeks but the November/December TRO process is dictated by regulations and must be 21 days minimum.4.13 January 2011 has been identified as the time when objections to any TROs will be considered. It may be necessary to seek a re-arranged January Area Commi

37、ttee or a special meeting of the Area Committee to consider any objections as it is likely that the 10th January 2011 Committee date will be too early to allow officers to analyse objections and prepare a report.5. LEGAL IMPLICATIONSThe terms of reference of the Area Committee state that the Area Co

38、mmittee may make a decision by resolution to allocate discretionary budgets within the terms determined by the Council (page 50 of the Councirs current constitution).5.1 There are no legal implications directly associated with this report. In the case of a Traffic Regulation Orders being prepared as

39、 part of the town-wide parking review in the future, the TROs must be drafted, considered and published in accordance with the Local Authorities Traffic Orders (Procedure) Regulations 1996 and other relevant legislation.6. FINANCIAL AND RISK IMPLICATIONSIn line with the approved Parking Strategy and

40、 Action Plan 65K per annum revenue investment was agreed through the Corporate Business Planning process in February 2010 for parking reviews in Baldock and Knebworth. 50k was also agreed for maintenance of signs and lines.6.1 In addition the capital programme agreed for 2010/11 allows 30k for imple

41、menting the Twitchell P&D. In light of the indicative programme this may not be implemented until towards the end of the financial year and could have an impact on the revenue budget.6.2 With regard to risk there is significant reputational risk associated with not addressing the on-street parking i

42、ssues surrounding the town centre and rail station and taking into consideration the displacement effects on surrounding streets. The implementation of TROs as part of the town-wide parking reviews are included on the Councirs risk register and is updated annually.7. HUMAN RESOURCE AND EQUALITIES IM

43、PLICATIONSThe officer time involved in reviewing and undertaking the recommended actions outlined in Appendix 1 is identified as part of the Corporate Business Planning Process for Planning Services. Actions that involve TROs have also been included in other relevant Service plans, such as the Parki

44、ng Service and Legal Service, given the requirement to bring in other officers across the council at various stages as various issues raised through the review process are addressed.7.1 The Council recognises the changing nature of equality legislation and incorporates national legislation and regul

45、ations into its scheme and services as appropriate, as set out in the Councils Corporate Equality Strategy. The Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000 marked a very significant innovation in the legal framework. It placed much of what was previously only advisory and voluntary on to a statutory footing

46、. The Act extends the provisions of the Race Relations Act 1976 to cover all the activities of all public authorities. It makes important extensions to public authority duties. Equivalent statutory duties have been created for disability by the Disability Discrimination Act 2005 and for gender by th

47、e Equality Act 2006. These duties divide into a general duty and specific duties.7.2 The contents of this report do not directly impact on equality, in that it is not making proposals that will have a direct impact on equality of access or outcomes for diverse groups.7.3 All efforts will be made to

48、meet the Councils equalities plan when working together with and informing the local community on the implementation of TROs in their area.8. CONSULTATION WITH EXTERNAL ORGANISATIONS AND WARD MEMBERSIssues relating to on-street car parking within the town centre and on surrounding residential street

49、s have been documented as part of the on-going consultation associated with the preparation of the Baldock Town Centre Strategy and the Baldock Town Centre Enhancement Scheme.9. RECOMMENDATIONSThat the Committees views on parking issues in Baldock be reported to Officers.9.1 That the Committee agree

50、 the scope for the review in line with those issues described as category 1 and 2, i.e. as listed under paragraphs 3.4 and 3.5 of this report.9.2 That the Committee endorse the indicative programme for the review as set out in Appendix 1.9.3 That Officers report to the Baldock Area Committee on prog

51、ress with the Parking Review for Baldock.10. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATRIONSTo ensure the Parking Review for Baldock has an agreed scope and can be delivered within the planned programme and that the issues for consideration are recorded as early as possible.11. ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS CONSIDEREDCategory 3

52、 parking review areas have been identified but are unlikely to be addressed due to limited resources at this stage.12. APPENDICESAppendix 1: Baldock Parking Review Programme14. CONTACT OFFICERSLouise Symes, Planning Projects Manager, ext 4359Simon Young, Transport Policy Officer, ext 4846John Ironsi

53、de, Corporate Strategic Planning & Enterprise Manager, ext 4626Katie White, Corporate Legal Manager and Monitoring Officer Ext 4315Tim Neill, Accountancy Manager, ext 4470Rebecca Skinner, Human Resources Advisor, Ext 4481BACKGROUND PAPERS14.1 Baldock Town Centre StrategyNHDC Parking Strategy and Act

54、ion PlanAPPENDIX 1INDICATIVE WORK PROGRAMME FOR BALDOCK PARKING REVIEW:JUNE 2010 TO MAY 2011(Note the programme from December to May forms part of the Local Authority Traffic Order (Procedure) Regulations 1996 and is subject to change depending on the number and nature of objections received)Timelin

55、eTasksJune 2010 Visual survey parking usage of existing streets and Twitchell Car Park as listed under category 2June inspection and analysis of category 1 issuesJune Analyse any feedback of existing information/correspondence from users.June Informal liaison with key representative e.g. Town Centre

56、 Manager, local police, Herts Highways on category 1 and 2 issuesJune Mapping/recording usage of streets.June/July Preparation of consultation documents. Issuing consultation documents (door to door posting)July Consultation for three weeksEnd July Collation and analysis of survey results Mapping su

57、rvey resultsJuly/August Drafting scheme options for category 1 and 2 issues Minor survey work to fine tune proposals Additional minor detailed consultationSeptember Update report to Baldock & District Committee Preparation of final consultation material Issue final consultationSeptember Consultation for three weeks