带张紧绞车的带式输送机液压拉紧系统设计含9张CAD图
带张紧绞车的带式输送机液压拉紧系统设计含9张CAD图,带张紧,绞车,输送,液压,拉紧,系统,设计,cad
中期汇报表学生姓名XX专 业XX学 号20140601102设计(论文)题目带张紧绞车的带式输送机液压拉紧系统设计毕业设计(论文)前期工作小结一、设计工作完成情况1.透过检索文献,阅读了参考文献,撰写了文献综述;2.再次搜索了相关文献资料,与导师不断探讨,确定了论文方向;3.对课题要求设计的小型液压拉紧系统进行了方案设计及分析;4.确定了需要的液压元件;5.运用AutoCAD绘制液压系统原理图。二、存在的问题1.对张紧绞车的工作原理认识不足;2.带式输送机液压拉紧装置采用电液比例溢流阀控制压力升降成本高。三、解决方案1.透过阅读和比较文献综述找到适宜的设计方法,并遵循指导老师的引导;2.保证张紧力可以随工作需要增压,确保系统的启动。四、后期工作安排: 部件图绘制,说明书编写,总图绘制,准备答辩总图绘制。指导教师意见态度认真,能够按时按量完成设计工作。前期已完成的工作基本上与毕业设计任务书以及开题报告中的要求的内容基本吻合,整体完成情况良好。遵守学校出勤纪律,能主动的找导师沟通,共同研究设计中遇到的问题。能全面收集关于课题研究方面的内容,写作过程中能综合运用知识,全面分析毕业论文说明书问题,综合运用知识能力强。签名: 2018年 4 月 20 日XX中期情况检查表 学院名称: 机电工程学院 检查日期:2018 年 4 月 23 日学生姓名XX专 业XX指导教师XX设计(论文)题目带张紧绞车的带式输送机液压拉紧系统设计工作进度情况按时上交任务书及开题报告,完成总体方案的设计,调研并选定传动机构主要参数,给定部分参考图,完成传动系统总图及主要零部件图的设计。是否符合任务书要求进度是 能否按期完成任务能 工作态度情况(态度、纪律、出勤、主动接受指导等) 工作态度端正,遵守纪律,按时出勤,能够主动接受指导,按时上交以及汇报相关作业完成进度。主动地找老师询问一些有关论文方面的相关问题,并进行认真的核实和修改。毕业设计的思路比较清晰,工作量充实。质量评价(针对已完成的部分)篇幅符合学院规定,内容完整,层次结构安排科学,主要观点突出,逻辑关系清楚,有一定的个人见解,毕业设计的论文思路比较清晰,工作量充实,设计内容切合实际。存在问题和解决办法存在问题:1、论文对张紧绞车的计算不足;2、图纸表述不清晰。解决方法:1、增加张紧绞车部分的计算;2、图纸按照国际和机械图标标准补充完整。 检查人签名 教学院长签名 外文翻译EFFECTS OF CUTTING EDGE GEOMETRY,WORKPIECE HARDNESS,FEED RATE AND CUTTING SPEED ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS AND FORCES IN FINISH TURNING OF HARDENED AISI H13 STEEL切削刃几何形状、工件硬度、进料率和切削速度对H13 钢精加工表面粗糙度和力的影响 EFFECTS OF CUTTING EDGE GEOMETRY,WORKPIECE HARDNESS, FEED RATE AND CUTTING SPEED ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS AND FORCES IN FINISH TURNING OF HARDENED AISI H13 STEEL Tugrul zel, Tsu-Kong Hsu, Erol Zeren Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Jersey 08854 USA AbstractIn this study, effects of cutting edge geometry, workpiece hardness, feed rate and cutting speed on surface roughness and resultant forces in the finish hard turning of AISI H13 steel were experimentally investigated. Cubic boron nitrite inserts with two distinct edge preparations and through-hardened AISI H-13 steel bars were used. Four factor (hardness, edge geometry, feed rate and cutting speed)- two level fractional experiments were conducted and statistical analysis of variance was performed. During hard turning experiments, three components of tool forces and roughness of the machined surface were measured. This study shows that the effects of workpiece hardness, cutting edge geometry, feed rate and cutting speed on surface roughness are statistically significant. The effects of two-factor interactions of the edge geometry and the workpiece hardness, the edge geometry and the feed rate, and the cutting speed and feed rate are also appeared to be important. Especially, small edge radius and lower workpiece surface hardness resulted in better surface roughness. Cutting edge geometry, workpiece hardness and cutting speed are found to be affecting force components. The lower workpiece surface hardness and small edge radius resulted in lower tangential and radial forces.1. INTRODUCTION Hard turning, machining ferrous metal parts that are hardened usually between 45-70 HRC, can be performed dry using polycrystalline cubic boron nitride (PCBN, commonly CBN) cutting tools as extensively reported in literature 1-8. Research results in the literature concerning mechanism of serrated chip formation in order to relate process characteristics and stability of cutting to the chip shapes during hard turning 9-19. Other research concerning with composition, temperatures and wear characteristics of CBN cutting tools 1,8,20,21,22,28 and effects of work material properties, tool geometry and cutting conditions on surface integrity of the finish machined parts 23-28 indicate challenges in hard turning and identifies various process, equipment and tooling related factors affecting surface quality, tool life and productivity. After reviewing the literature, factors affecting forces, tool wear/failure and roughness and integrity of the finished surfaces in hard turning using CBN cutting tools and their influences on each other are illustrated with a chart shown in Fig. 1. In this chart, the parameters above the horizontal dashed lines are considered as factors or inputs to the hard turning process and they can only be selected in the beginning except tool vibration. All other parameters, that are located below these dashed lines, considered as performance measures or outputs of the hard turning process. Review of the literature reveals that almost all of the factors given in this chart affect performance of the hard turning process. Those factors can be classified as follows:1.1 Cutting tool geometry and material propertiesHard turning with CBN cutting tools demands prudent design of tool geometry. CBN cutting tools have lower toughness than other common tool materials, thus chipping ismore likely 2. Therefore, a nose radius and proper edge preparation are essential to increase the strength of cutting edge and attain favorable surface characteristics on finished metal components 23. CBN cutting tools designed for hard turning feature negative rake geometry and edge preparation (a chamfer or a hone, or even both). Specifications of the edge preparation design are often finalized after extensive experimentation. Fig. 2 shows the types of edge preparations common for CBN cutting tools. According to recent studies, it is evident that effect of edge geometry on surface quality is significant 23-28.Fig. 1. A flow chart illustrating relationships of factors in hard turning.Theile et al. 24, 25, presented research results of an experimental investigation of effects of cutting edge geometry and workpiece hardness on residual stresses in finish hard turning of AISI 52100 steel. They indicated that both factors are significant for the surface integrity of finish hard turned components. Specifically, they showed that large hone radius tools produce more compressive stresses, but also leave “white-layers”. zel 26 investigated the influence of edge geometry in CBN tools with respect to stress and temperature development through finite element simulations in hard turning. Chou et al. 28 experimentally investigated the influence of CBN content on surface quality and tool wear in hardened AISI 52100 steel tool. This study concluded that low content CBN tools produce better surface roughness with respect to higher content CBN tools and depth of cut has minor effect on tool wear rate.Fig. 2. Type of edge preparations for CBN cutting tools.1.2 Workpiece hardness Due to the changes in properties of hardened workpiece material, basic shearing process and formation of chips differ in hard turning 5. Prior research showed that workpiece hardness has a profound effect on the performance of the CBN tools 1,2,8 and also integrity of finish machined surfaces 23,25. Matsumoto et al. On the return trip the bottom coal is mined with the advantage of a free face and a smaller proportion of the leading drum cutting coal; consequently leading to less restrictions of the haulage speed due to the specific cutting energy of the material. The shearer sumps in mid seam near the head gate to the full web without invoking unproductive cycle time. 23 and Thiele et al. 25 studied the effect of workpiece hardness on residual stresses. In a recent study, Guo and Liu 27 investigated material properties of hardened AISI 52100 bearing steel using temperature controlled tensile tests and orthogonal cutting tests and demonstrated that hardness greatly influences the material properties accounting for high variation in flow stress properties.1.3 Cutting speed, feed rate and depth of cut Performance of CBN cutting tools is highly dependent on the cutting conditions i.e. cutting speed, feed, feed-rate, and depth of cut 7. Especially cutting speed and depth of cut significantly influence tool life 22. Increased cutting speed and depth of cut result in increased temperatures at the cutting zone. Since CBN is a ceramic material, at elevated temperatures chemical wear becomes a leading wear mechanism and often accelerates weakening of cutting edge, resulting in premature tool failure (chipping), namely edge breakage of the cutting tool. In addition, Thiele et al. 24 noticed that when feed rate is increased, residual stresses change from compressive to tensile. 1.4 Surface integrity, residual stresses and tool wear In general, residual stresses become more compressive as workpiece hardness increases. The hardness and fracture toughness of CBN tools decrease with reduced CBN content 8. Owing to ceramic binder phase, CBN-L tools have a lower thermal conductivity, which causes increasing temperatures of cutting edge during hard turning. Chou and Barash 9 reported that CBN-L tools are more suitable for finish turning of hardened steel. At low cutting speeds, tool life of CBN-L is superior to CBN-H, whereas at higher cutting speeds, the reverse is true, and also surface roughness is less favorable when using CBN-H tool 28. Thiele et al. 24 reported that residual stresses generated by large edge hone tools are typically more compressive than stresses produced by small edge hone tools and they also leave white-layers. In addition, the effects of edge geometry play an important role in thermoplastic deformation of the workpiece. Koenig et al. 3 reported that an increase in feed rate raises the compressive residual stress maximal and deepens the affected zone. It was also suggested that the chamfer is unfavorable in terms of attainable surface finish when compared to honed or sharp edges.1.5 Accuracy and rigidity of the machine tool Another parameter that is often ignored is tool vibration. In order to reduce tool vibration it is necessary provide sufficiently rigid tool and workpiece fixtures. Assuring that there is minimal tool vibration is an easy way to improve surface roughness. It is also necessary that the tooling system be extremely rigid to withstand the immense cutting forces. It is well known that the radial force is the largest among force components during hard turning. Many researchers indicated that extremely rigid, high power, and high precision machine tools are required for hard turning because CBN tools are brittle and prone to chipping 3, 7, 8, 14, 23. It is also suggested that having higher rigidity in machine tool-clamping-tooling system achieves better surface quality on the part. It is well known that vibration and chatter are important problems that degrade part quality and tool performance. To improve the overall efficiency of finish hard turning, it is necessary to have a complete process understanding. To this end, a great deal of research has been performed in order to quantify the effect of various hard turning process parameters to surface quality. In order to gain a greater understanding of the hard turning process it is necessary to understand the impact of each of these variables, but also the interactions between them. It is impossible to find all of the variables that impact surface quality in finish hard turning. In addition, it is costly and time-consuming to discern the effect of every variable on the output.2. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE 2.1 Workpiece material The workpiece material used in this study was AISI H13 hot work tool steel, which is used for high demand tooling. The cylindrical bar AISI H13 specimen that are utilized in this experiments had a diameter of 1.25 inches and length of 2 feet. The bar specimens were heat treated (through-hardened) at in-house heat treatment facility in order to obtain the desired hardness values of 50 and 55 HRC. However, the subsequent hardness tests by using Future Tech Rockwell type hardness tester revealed that the actual hardness of each specimen was 51.31.0 and 54.70.5 HRC. Henceforth, the hardness values are defined by the mean values of the measured workpiece hardness. 2.2 Tooling and edge geometry CBN inserts with two distinct representative types of edge preparations were investigated in this study. These edge preparations include: a) “chamfered” (T-land) edges and b) “honed” edges as illustrated in Fig.2. Solid top CBN inserts (TNM-433 and GE Superabrasives BZN 8100 grade) inserts were used with a Kennametal DTGNR-124B right hand tool holder with 00 lead and 50 rake angles. Honed and chamfered insert edge geometry were measured in coordinated measurement machine with three replications using a high precision touch-trigger probe. For the honed inserts, an average radius of 10.5 4.0 m was found. Chamfered insert edge geometry was found to have 200 chamfer angle and 0.1 0.03 mm chamfer width using same instruments with three replications and was approximated to an equivalent hone radius of 101.6 5.1 m. A categorization of shearer loader cutting sequences is realised by four major parameters . Firstly, one can separate between mining methods, which mine coal in two directions meaning from the head to the tailgate and on the return run as well or in one direction only. Secondly, the way the mining sequence deals with the situation at the face ends, to advance face line after extract-ing the equivalent of a cutting web, is a characteristic parameter for each separate method. The nec-essary travel distance while sumping varies between the sequences, as does the time needed to per-form this task, too. Another aspect defining the sequences is the proportion of the web cutting coal per run. Whereas traditionally the full web was used, the introduction of modern AFC and roof sup-port automation control systems allows for efficient operations using half web methods. The forth parameter identifying state of the art shearer loader cutting sequences is the opening created per run.2.3 Experimental design A four factor two level factorial design was used to determine the effects of the cutting edge geometry, workpiece hardness, feed rate and cutting speed on surface roughness and resultant forces in the finish hard turning of AISI H 13 steel. The factors and factor levels are summarized in Table 1. These factor levels results in a total of 16 unique factor level combinations. Sixteen replications of each factor level combinations were conducted resulting in a total of 256 tests. Each replication represents 25.4 mm cutting length in axial direction. The response variables are the workpiece surface roughness and the cutting forces.Longitudinal turning was conducted on a rigid, high-precision CNC lathe (Romi Centur 35E) at a constant depth of cut at 0.254 mm. The bar workpieces were held in the machine with a collet to minimize run-out and maximize rigidity. The length of cut for each test was 25.4 mm in the axial direction. Due to availability constraints, each insert were used for one factor level combination, which consisted of 16 replications. (A total of three honed and three chamfer inserts were available). In this manner each edge preparation was subject to the same number of tests and the same axial length of cut. Finally, surface roughness and tool wear measurements were conducted when the cutting length reached 203.2 mm (8 inches) and 406.4 mm (16 inches) during each factor level combination. The surface roughness was measured with a Taylor-Habson Surtronic 3+ profilometer and Mitutoyo SJ-digital surface analyzer, using a trace length of 4.8 mm, a cut-off length of 0.8 mm. The surface roughness values were recorded at eight equally spaced locations around the circumference every 25.4 mm distance from the edge of the specimen to obtain statistically meaningful data for each factor level combination. CBN inserts were examined using a tool-maker microscope to measure flank wear depth and detect undesirable features on the edge of the cutting tool by interrupting finish hard turning process. 2.4 Cutting force measurements The cutting forces were measured with a three-component force dynamometer (Kistler Type 9121) mount on the turret disk of the CNC lathe via a custom designed turret adapter (Kistler type 9121) for the toolholder creating a very rigid tooling fixture. The charge signal generated at the dynamometer was amplified using charge amplifiers (Kistler Type 5814B1). The amplified signal is acquired and sampled by using data acquisition PCMCIA card and Kistler DyanoWare software on a laptop computer at a sampling frequency of 2000 Hz per channel. Time-series profiles of the acquired force data reveal that the forces are relatively constant over the length of cut and factors such as vibration and spindle run-out were negligible. Three components of the resultant force are shown schematically in Fig. 3. Fig. 3. Measured cutting-force components.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to identify statistically significant trends in the measured surface roughness and cutting force data. Separate ANOVA analyses were conducted for Ra surface roughness values and for each component of the cutting force i.e. axial (feed), radial (thrust), and tangential (cutting) forces. Additionally, plots of significant factors corresponding to each ANOVA analysis were constructed. These plots provide a more in-depth analysis of the significant factors related to the surface roughness and cutting forces in finish hard turning of AISI H13 steel using chamfered and honed CBN inserts.3.1 ANOVA results ANOVA tables for Ra surface roughness parameters are given in Table 2. In addition to degree of freedom (DF), mean square (MS) and F values (F) the table shows the P-values (P) associate with each factor level and interaction. A low P-value indicates an indication of statistical significange for the source on the response. Table 2 show that the main effects of edge geometry, cutting speed and feed rate except hardness, interactions between edge geometry and hardness, feed rate, and cutting speed, the interactions between cutting speed and feed rate are significant to surface roughness. Feed rate is the dominant parameter associated with the surface roughness. This is expected because it is well known that the theoretical surface roughness is primarily a function of the feed for a given nose radius and varies as the square of the feed rate 8.The advantage of the half- or, more precisely, partial- opening cutting sequence is the fact that the face is extracted in two passes. Figure 2b shows that the upper and middle part of the seam is cut during the pass towards the tailgate. Whereas the last part of this trip for the equivalent of a ma-chine length the leading drum is raised to cut the roof to allow the roof support to be advanced. On the return trip the bottom coal is mined with the advantage of a free face and a smaller proportion of the leading drum cutting coal; consequently leading to less restrictions of the haulage speed due to the specific cutting energy of the material. The shearer sumps in mid seam near the head gate to the full web without invoking unproductive cycle time. Like for the trip the tailgate the leading drum has to be lowered a machine length ahead of the main gate.The radial force is usually the largest, tangential force is the middle and the axial (feed) force is the smallest in finish hard turning. In general, cutting force components are influences by cutting speed, edge geometry and feed rate. Tables 3-5 are ANOVA tables corresponding to the radial, axial (feed force) and tangential components of the cutting force, respectively. These tables show that the main effects of workpiece hardness, the edge geometry, cutting speed and feed rate (except for axial force) are all significant with respect to the forces in the radial, axial and tangential directions.Table 3 shows that the main effects of the edge geometry, cutting speed, hardness and the interactions between edge geometry and hardness, cutting speed, feed rate are significant with respect to the forces in the axial (feed) direction. Axial (feed) force is not much influence by the change in feed rate. Table 4 shows that the main effects of the edge geometry, cutting speed, hardness and only the interactions between edge geometry and cutting speed, feed rate are significant with respect to the forces in the radial direction.Table 5 shows that the main effects of the edge geometry, cutting speed, hardness, feed and only the interactions between edge geometry and hardness, cutting speed, feed rate are significant with respect to the forces in the tangential direction.3.2 Effect of feed rate and edge preparation on surface roughness Graphs of Ra surface roughness parameters are shown in Figures 4 and 5. These figures have been constructed to illustrate the main effects of edge geometry and feed rate parameters on the surface roughness. Based on the previous analysis, the main effect of the interaction between edge geometry and feed rate are found to be statistically significant on surface roughness Ra. Fig. 4 sho
收藏