小型蔬菜播种机设计【三维PROE模型】【含19张CAD图纸】
喜欢就充值下载吧。资源目录里展示的全都有,下载后全都有,请放心下载,原稿可自行编辑修改【QQ:1304139763 可咨询交流】=喜欢就充值下载吧。资源目录里展示的全都有,下载后全都有,请放心下载,原稿可自行编辑修改【QQ:1304139763 可咨询交流】=喜欢就充值下载吧。资源目录里展示的全都有,下载后全都有,请放心下载,原稿可自行编辑修改【QQ:1304139763 可咨询交流】=
毕业设计评 阅 书毕业设计(论文)题目: 小型蔬菜播种机的设计 学生姓名: 提交评阅文件:设计说明书 页,图表 张指导教师及评阅人评语: 指导教师签名: 评阅人签名: 毕业答辩情况表答辩时间: 年 月 日答辩小组成员姓名职称工作单位备注答辩简要情况及评语:专业答辩委员会意见:答辩委员会主任: 年 月 日成绩 本科毕业设计毕业设计图册学生姓名: 学 号: 学 院: 机电工程学院 专业年级: 机械设计制造及其自动化 题 目: 小型蔬菜播种机的设计 指导教师: 评阅教师: 年 月学号: 专业年级: 学生姓名: 设计课题: 小型蔬菜播种机的设计 指导教师: 内装:1.设计说明书及附件 1本2.毕业设计图纸 1本3.评分表 1份4.答辩记录表 1份毕业设计(论文)实习报告 学生姓名: 学 号: 学院: 机电工程学院 专 业: 机械设计制造及自动化 设计(论文)题目: 小型蔬菜播种机的设计 指导教师: 年 月 日一、实习目的毕业实习是工科本科学生的一个很重要的实践性教学环节。其任务是根据机械设计制造及其自动化专业的培养目标,组织学生参观相关的机械企业或部门,培养学生重视实践、增强理论联系实际的观念,深入调查研究、拓宽视野、增强面向人才市场、服务于社会的观念。我们这半学期的主要任务就是进行毕业设计,把我们大学四年所学到的机械知识理论联系现实生产需求进行综合应用。这样即可以进一步巩固所学的理论知识,又对即将走向的工作岗位作一次实战性的演习。因此这次毕业设计对于我们这些即将走向工作岗位的大四的毕业生来说是很重要的。为了给毕业设计做一个良好的铺垫,毕业实习便成了一个不可缺少的环节。二、实习时间:2012.03.10三、实习地点:农机配送站四、实习内容 在老师的带领之下,我们来到了农机配送站,我们此行的目的是参观跟我们设计题目有关的播种机,由于与我们的设计课题有关,所以我们看的很仔细。我看到了的播种机的大概结构是:它主要由拖拉机等机械带动,在播种机上的驱动轮的动力下驱动,由驱动轮驱动,然后在驱动轴带动下由一组链条带动它的另一根轴,这根轴上装有一边开槽的圆盘,它的主要目的是实行穴播,根掘轴的转速配合播种穴距即可设计出满足要求的圆盘开槽的位置及其大小。然后它还设有一个专门用来施肥的斗,它的轴在驱动轴的带动下进行旋转,然后斗中的化肥便可以施到地早。然后还看到它装有镇压轮,是用来对播种到土壤里的种子进行覆土镇压的。我们还细心注意到它在开沟器的正上方有一个可以转动的装置,在问过师傅之后我们了解到它是用来防止杂草等物的附着,从而减少行进中的阻力,大大提高了工作效率。我还注意到一个小细节,就是他有一部分装置在我们看来好像没什么用,问过师傅以后才知道那是用来调节驱动轮的高低的,通过调节它的高低从而调节驱动力的大小以适应各种土壤的作业。我还看到播种机上的传动装置所用到的齿轮都是塑料齿轮,想来也是,农业机械作业强度不大,用塑料齿轮强度足够,这样既节省材料又节约了成本,想必也是机械的发展趋势。我所设计的题目是电动小型播种机,我的课题动力装置是电动的,所以跟这次参观的还有所不同,我的想法是用电动机作为驱动装置,然后由它驱动驱动轴转动,然后其余工作装置跟这次参观的应该大致相同,然后再就是对一些方面进行改进,以利于操作。以电力为动力既经济又环保,而且在很大程度上提高了作业效率。 五、实习结果 参观完毕以后,我对我的课题小型蔬菜播种机有了较为深刻的了解,对于它的结构、工作原理以及各零部件的结构、作用也有了一些认识。但是如果开始做设计的话我感觉手头资料还是有些不足,而且我对国内外播种机的发展现状了解的不是很多,于是我在空闲之余利用网络资源在网上查找了一些与播种机相关的资料,在查过资料之后我了解到播种机的类型按播种方法,可分为以下几种: 撒播机。使撒出的种子在播种地块上均匀分布的播种机。常用的机型为离心式撒播机,附装在农用运输车后部。撒播装置也可安装在农用飞机上使用。 条播机。主要用于谷物、蔬菜、牧草等小粒种子的播种作业。常用的有谷物条播机,作业时,由行走轮带动排种轮旋转,种子按要求由种子箱排入输种管并经开沟器落入沟槽内,然后由覆七镇压装置将种子覆盖压实 穴播机。按一定行距和穴距,将种子成穴播种的种植机械。每穴可播1粒或数粒种子,分别称单粒精播或多粒穴播,主要用于玉米、棉花、甜菜、向同葵、豆类等中耕作物,又称中耕作物播种机。每个播种机单体可完成开沟、排种、覆土、镇压等整个作业过程。 精密播种机。以精确的播种量、株行距和深度进行作业的播种机。具有节省种子、免除出苗后的问苗作业、苗距整齐的优点。一般在穴播机各类排种器的基础上改进而成。也有事先将单粒种子按一定间距固定的纸带播种,或使种子垂直回转运动的环形橡胶或塑料制种带孔排入种沟。 联合作业机和免耕播种机。如在谷物条播机上加设肥料箱、排肥装置,即可在播种的同时施肥。免耕播种机是在前茬作物收获后直接开出种沟播种,以防止水土流失、节省能源,降低作物成本。 我们组由于每个人的设计题目不同,所以在这次实习时不仅看到了与我的设计有关的播种机,而且还和其他同学一起观看了关于数控切割机、铝壶上底机等设备,扩大了我的视野。通过这次实习,再结合前一段时间查阅的大量资料,给我的设计也带来了许多灵感。经过查阅资料和深入工厂实习,自己深深地体会到要想搞好设计,就要耐心仔细地查找与设计相关的资料和信息,它要包括设计产品的基本功能、主要结构、应用特点及其发展前途,市场效益等。除此之外,我们还要对各种零部件型号的选择,从实用性和经济性等方面进行深入的了解,全面的考虑。只有这样,才能为自己以后较快的融入社会工作之中,少走弯路,少犯错误打下一个较好的基础。 我设计的是穴播机,在上网查到一些资料以后,再结合我自己所参观学习到的内容,充分利用现有成熟的设计部分,以便节约设计时间和提高产品的可靠性与经济性。通过这次实习我收集了大量的实用资料,为正式的设计做好了充分的准备。六、实习总结及体会 由于我们这一组每个人的设计题目都不相同,在设计过程中肯定会出现一些靠个人力量很难解决的问题,为了我们大家在将来的设计中能互相帮助,发挥团队精神,大家通力合作,顺利完成设计,同时也为了我们能学到更多专业性知识,增强我们的专业技能,开阔我们的眼界。相信在万斌老师以及其它同学的帮助下,我肯定能增长不少知识,从而为做好这次设计给予很大的帮助。 通过这次实习一方面巩固了我们原有的书本上的理论知识并为我们以后将要学习到的更多专业知识奠定了良好的基础,另一方面使我们能够掌握要领,并做到举一反三,培养自己分析和解决生产实际问题的能力,提前进入未来将要从事的工作角色。 实习虽然结束了,但通过实习使我们获得基本生产的感性知识,理论联系实际,扩大我们的知识面;同时也锻炼和培养我们业务能力及素质,培养我们具有吃苦耐劳的精神,也是我们接触社会、了解企业的一个绝好的机会。我们掌握了工程机械设计的基本流程、各种参数的选择、各种影响因素产生的特点,从而使我们从容的面对以后的设计和我们即将踏入的工作岗位。 第 3 页毕业设计(论文)翻译 学生姓名: 学 号: 学院: 机电工程学院 专 业: 机械设计制造及自动化 设计(论文)题目: 小型蔬菜播种机的设计 指导教师: 年 月 日Mathematical Modelling of Vacuum Pressure on a Precision SeederAbstractThe purpose of this research was to determine the optimum vacuum pressure of a precision vacuum seeder and to develop mathematical models by using some physical properties of seeds such as one thousand kernel mass, projected area, sphericity and kernel density. Maize, cotton, soya bean, watermelon, melon, cucumber, sugarbeet and onion seeds were used in laboratory tests. One thousand kernel mass, projected area, sphericity and kernel density of seeds varied from 4.3 to 372.5g, 577mm2, 38.485.8% and 4401310kgm3, respectively. The optimum vacuum pressure was determined as 4.0kPa for maize I and II; 3.0kPa for cotton, soya bean and watermelon I; 2.5kPa for watermelon II, melon and cucumber; 2.0kPa for sugarbeet; and 1.5kPa for onion seeds. The vacuum pressure was predicted by mathematical models. According to the results, the final model could satisfactorily describe the vacuum pressure of the precision vacuum seeder with a chi-square of 2.51103, root mean square error of 2.74102 and modelling efficiency of 0.99. Nomenclature Nomenclature a, b, c, d, e regression coefficients Em modelling efficiency Erms root mean square error kexp experimental vacuum pressure, kPa kexp, mean mean value of experimental vacuum pressure, kPa kpre predicted vacuum pressure, kPa L length, mm m1000 one thousand kernel mass, g N number of observation n number of constants in the model P projected area, mm2 Pv vacuum pressure, kPa p probability R2 coefficient of determination T thickness, mm W width, mm sphericity, % 2 chi-square k kernel density, kgm3Article OutlineNomenclature 1. Introduction 2. Literature review 3. Materials and methods 4. Results and discussion 5. Conclusions Acknowledgements References1. IntroductionPrecision sowing has been a major thrust of agricultural engineering research for many years; however, most of the research and development work has dealt with seeders for agronomic crops. The main purpose of sowing is to place the seed to a certain space and a depth in the seedbed. Precision seeders place seeds at the required spacing and provide a better growing area per seed. There are two common types of precision seeders: belt and vacuum. Precision vacuum seeders have a metering plate with metering holes on a predetermined radius. A vacuum is applied to these metering holes by means of a race machined in a backing plate. As the plate rotates, the vacuum applied to the metering holes enables them to pick up seeds from the seed hopper. Precision vacuum seeders have the following advantages over the mechanical seeders: better working quality, more precise seed rates with lower rate of seed damage, better control and adjustment of upkeep and drift of seeds, and broader spectrum of applicability (Soos et al., 1989). A seeder should place a seed in an environment in which the seed will reliably germinate and emerge. A number of factors affect the spacing of plants. The seed selection mechanism may fail to select or drop a seed resulting in large spacing between seeds. The mechanism may select and drop multiple seeds resulting in small spacings between seeds. Seed quality, soil conditions, seeder design and the skill of the operator all play a part in determining the final plant stand. The physical properties of seeds are essential for the design of equipment for handling, processing, storing and sowing the kernels. Various types of cleaning, grading, separation and sowing equipment are designed on the basis of the physical properties of seeds. However, no model has been found to describe seeder parameters such as vacuum pressure related with physical properties of seeds. The physical properties of the seeds are the most important factors in determining the optimum vacuum pressure of the precision vacuum seeder. In this study, using some of these, e.g. one thousand kernel mass, projected area, sphericity and kernel density, mathematical models were developed to predict optimum vacuum pressure. The experimental values of vacuum pressure were determined from laboratory test procedure. 2. Materials and methodsThe laboratory test procedure involved testing the metering uniformity of the seeder at the different vacuum pressure with the different seeds: two different maize varieties (maize I and maize II), cotton, soya bean, two different watermelon varieties (watermelon I and watermelon II), melon, cucumber, sugarbeet and onion. These seeds represent several seed shapes varying from spherical (soya bean, maize II) to flat and elongated (maize I, melon, watermelon, cucumber). Two different varieties of maize and watermelon seeds were selected, because of the more diverse range of one thousand kernel mass, projected area, sphericity or kernel density than other seeds. All seeds used in this research were uncoated seed. The main dimensions of the seeds are given in Table 1. The seeder was set to space the seeds as closely to the recommended spacing as possible. Table 1. Means and standard errors of the seed dimensions A grease belt test stand was used to determine sowing uniformity of each seed at the different vacuum pressures. This particular test stand had a 150mm wide belt with a 75m long horizontal viewing surface. A seeder row unit was mounted on a greased belt test stand which utilised an adjustable speed drive mechanism to operate the seed metering devices at a known constant speed. Sufficient oil was added to the top surface of belt to capture the seed as it was released from seeder unit without rolling or bouncing of seed on the belt surface. A wide variety of measures were used to qualify seeder performance with regard to plant spacing (Brooks & Church, 1987; Karayel & zmerzi, 2001; Jasa & Dickey, 1982). Some tests used performance measures involving distance between plants in the field. Other tests used performance measures involving distance between seeds on grease belt test stand or by opto-electronic sensor system ( Bracy et al., 1998; Smith et al., 1991; Lan et al., 1999). A few tests used performance measures involving distance between seeds sown into soil ( Panning, 1997). A precision vacuum seeder unit was operated in all treatments (Fig. 1). The seeder unit was a general purpose seeder designed for row crops such as maize and soya beans. Three different vacuum plates with different hole diameters were used in the metering mechanism. The diameter of vacuum plates were 230mm. The holes were drilled along a 200mm diameter pitch circle. The holes of the vacuum plate were 35mm in diameter for maize I, II, soya bean and cotton; 25mm in diameter for watermelon I, II, melon, and cucumber and 15mm in diameter for sugarbeet and onion. The seed plate operated in a vertical plane. Air suction from the holes of the seed plate caused the seed to stick to the holes. The stuck seed was released from the rotating plate by temporarily preventing airflow. The absence of suction allowed the seed to be dropped into soil. It had no seed tube and the seed fall height (12mm) of the seeder was kept low in order to reduce the chance of non-uniform spacing which can occur due to the bouncing of seed, if dropped from high plane. The vacuum level was regulated by adjusting the size of an opening in the vacuum line of seeder and measured with a manometer. Fig. 1. The metering mechanism of the precision vacuum seeder: 1, vacuum plate; 2, seed; 3, seed box; 4, air suction canal; 5, air cut; 6, furrow opener The seeder was operated over the greased belt at a ground speed of 1ms1 and adjusted to four vacuum pressures 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 and 5.0kPa for maize I, II, soya bean and cotton; 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 and 3.5kPa for melon, watermelon I, II and cucumber; 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5kPa for sugarbeet and onion seeds. Seed spacings were measured over a distance of 7m. The seeder was adjusted to deliver a nominal seed spacing of 230mm for maize I and II, 170mm for cotton, 105mm for soya bean, 550mm for watermelon I, II, melon and cucumber, 150mm for sugarbeet and 85mm for onion. The sowing uniformity was analysed using the methods as described by Kachman and Smith (1995). The multiple index is the percentage of spacings that are less than or equal to half of the theoretical spacing and indicates the percentage of multiple seed drops. The miss index is the percentage of spacings greater than 1.5 times the theoretical spacing and indicates the percentage of missed seed locations or skips. Quality of feed index is the percentage of spacings that are more than half but no more than 1.5 times the theoretical spacing. Quality of feed index is 100% minus miss and multiple index and indicates the percentages of single seed drops. Preciseness is the coefficient of variation of the spacings that are classified as singles after omitting the outliers consisting of misses and multiples. Kachman and Smith (1995) recommended using miss index, multiple index, quality of feed index and preciseness for summarising the uniformity of seeder metering rather than mean or sample coefficient of variation. They concluded that several measures were needed to give a true picture of seeder uniformity. For this study, miss index, multiple index, quality of feed index and preciseness are reported. Various physical properties of seeds including kernel density, projected area, sphericity and one thousand kernel mass are the most important factors in determining the optimum vacuum pressure of the precision vacuum seeder (Barut, 1996). The physical properties of the seeds were determined by the following methods: Linear dimensions, i.e. length, thickness and width were measured by using a vernier caliper with a sensitivity of 0.01mm. Sphericity were calculated by using the following equation (Mohsenin, 1970):(1)where: L is the length; W is the width; and T is the thickness in mm. One thousand kernel mass was measured by an electronic balance with a sensitivity of 0.001g. Kernel density was measured by the liquid displacement method. Toluene (C7H8) was used rather than water because it was not absorbed by fruits (Mohsenin, 1970; gt, 1998). Projected area was determined by using a digital camera (Kodak DC 5000) and Sigma Scan Pro 5 program. For the estimation of the vacuum pressure, in relation to kernel density, projected area, sphericity and one thousand kernel mass, mathematical models were developed. The suitability of the final model was compared and evaluated using chi-square, root mean square error and modelling efficiency. Chi-square 2, root mean square error Erms and modelling efficiency Em were calculated as follows:(2)(3)(4)where: kexp is the experimental vacuum pressure in kPa; kexp,mean is the mean value of experimental vacuum pressure in kPa; kpre is the predicted vacuum pressure in kPa; N is the number of observations; and n is the number of constants in the model. Reduced chi-square is the mean square of the deviations between the experimental and calculated values for the models and, is used to determine the goodness of the fit. The lower values of the reduced chi-square, the better the goodness of the fit. The root mean square error shows the deviations between the calculated and experimental values and it requires to reach zero. The modelling efficiency also shows the ability of the model and its highest value is 1 (Yaldiz et al., 2001; Ertekin & Yaldiz, 2004). Each experiment was arranged as a randomised complete block (Neter et al., 1990) and replicated five times. An analysis of variance method was applied to analyse data sets using a statistical software package SAS. Duncans multiple-range tests were used to identify significantly different means within dependent variables. 3. Results and discussionThe effect of vacuum pressure on sowing uniformity of the vacuum seeder was analysed relating to the multiple index, miss index, quality of feed index and preciseness. Multiple index, miss index and quality of feed index were combined for analysis of variance to determine the significant difference in the variability among the parameters. The results of this analysis are given in Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4. All measurement of sowing uniformity of the vacuum seeder were affected by vacuum pressure. Table 2. The sowing uniformity of the vacuum seeder with maize I and II, cotton and soya bean seeds for different vacuum pressure Note: Means within a group followed by same letter are not significantly different at probability p=005, by Duncans multiple range test.Table 3. The sowing uniformity of the vacuum seeder with watermelon I and II, melon and cucumber seeds for different vacuum pressure Note: Means within a group followed by same letter are not significantly different at probability p=005, by Duncans multiple range test.Table 4. The sowing uniformity of the vacuum seeder with sugarbeet and onion seeds for different vacuum pressure Note: Means within a group followed by same letter are not significantly different at probability p=0.05, by Duncans multiple range test.The optimum vacuum pressure was determined for each seed according to quality of feed index and preciseness. As can be seen from laboratory study results in Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4, the highest seed spacing uniformities (quality of feed index) and the lowest preciseness values were obtained at the vacuum pressure of 4.0kPa for maize I and II; 3.0kPa for cotton, soya bean and watermelon I; 2.5kPa for watermelon II, melon and cucumber; 2.0kPa for sugarbeet and 1.5kPa for onion seeds. The most uniform sowing uniformity was obtained with soya bean seeds at any vacuum pressures. Uniform, spherical seeds such as soya bean and maize II were easy to meter with the vacuum metering system. The miss index decreased and the multiple index increased with increasing vacuum pressure for all seeds. Multiple seed drops were more common than misses for watermelon I and II, melon, cucumber, onion and sugarbeet seeds. Few skips or multiple drops occur at any vacuum pressure for maize I and II, cotton and soya bean seeds. Loss of uniformity of the vacuum seeder was probably a combination of several factors. The results support reports from Barut (1996) who found that the pattern efficiency of the vacuum plate differed most at lower or higher vacuum pressures and faster wheel speeds. In this research, preciseness and quality of feed index of the vacuum seeder were poorer at the lower and higher vacuum pressures than optimum vacuum pressure. One thousand kernel mass, projected area, sphericity and kernel density of seeds are given in Table 5. One thousand kernel mass, projected area, sphericity and kernel density of seeds varied from 4.3 to 372.5g, 577mm2, 38.485.8% and 4401310kgm3, respectively. Table 5. Means and standard errors of the seed dimensions The relationship between one thousand kernel mass, projected area, sphericity and kernel density with vacuum pressure presented in Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4 and Fig. 5. For the determination of the relationship between the one thousand kernel mass and the projected area with vacuum pressure, the power model was used. For the determination of relationship between the sphericity and the kernel density with the vacuum pressure, the linear model was used. The diagrammatic representation of the models results in a curve that fits well for the description of the vacuum pressure. The relationship between one thousand kernel mass with vacuum pressure is better than the others with the highest coefficient of determination of 0.92. Fig. 2. Vacuum pressure of precision vacuum seeder as a function of one thousand kernel mass; R2, coefficient of determination Fig. 3. Vacuum pressure of vacuum seeder as a function of projected area; R2, coefficient of determination Fig. 4. Vacuum pressure of vacuum seeder as a function of sphericity; R2, coefficient of determination Fig. 5. Vacuum pressure of vacuum seeder as a function of kernel density; R2, coefficient of determination All possible combinations of the different variables were tested and included in the regression analysis. The multiple combinations of one thousand kernel mass, projected area, sphericity and kernel density that gave the lowest root mean square error and chi-square and the highest modelling efficiency were finally included in the final model. Based on the multiple regression analysis the accepted model constants, coefficients, chi-square 2, root mean square error Erms and modelling efficiency Em were as follows:Pv=a+bm1000027+cP002d+ekwhere: Pv is the vacuum pressure in kPa; m1000 is one thousand kernel mass in g; P is the projected area in mm2; is the sphericity in %; k is the kernel density in kgm3. The optimum values of the coefficient a, b, c, d, and e, namely 1.00, 0.72, 2.09103, 0.01 and 0.37103, respectively, gave values for 2 of 2.51103, for Erms of 2.74102, and for Em of 0.99. Validation of the established final model was evaluated by comparing the computed vacuum pressures with the observed vacuum pressures. The performance of the model was illustrated in Fig. 6. The predicted data generally banded around the straight line which showed the suitability of the final model in describing vacuum pressure of the seeder. Fig. 6. Experimental versus predicted vacuum pressure values by final model; R2, coefficient of determination 4. ConclusionsIn laboratory tests, the optimum vacuum pressure of a precision vacuum seeder was determined as 4.0kPa for maize I and II; 3.0kPa for cotton, soya bean and watermelon I; 2.5kPa for watermelon II, melon and cucumber; 2.0kPa for sugarbeet and 1.5kPa for onion seeds. In order to predict vacuum pressure in relation to one thousand kernel mass, projected area, sphericity and kernel density of seeds, mathematical models were developed. The relationship between one thousand kernel mass with vacuum pressure was better than the others with the highest coefficient of determination. The final model could satisfactorily describe the vacuum pressure of the precision vacuum seeder with a chi-square of 2.51103, root mean square error of 2.74102 and modelling efficiency of 0.99. Acknowledgements The corresponding author acknowledge the help of Dr. Can ERTEKIN in developing the mathematical models. 真空压力播种机的数学建模引言 这项研究的目的是确定最佳的精密真空压力播种机。通过运用种子的一些物理性质如每1000粒种子的质量,表面积、圆度和种子密度来建立数学模型.。分别取玉米、棉花、大豆、西瓜、甜瓜、黄瓜、甜菜、洋葱的种子作为实验对象。结果,每1000粒种子质量、表面积、圆度和种子密度分别为4.3-372.5g、 5-77m2、38.485.8%、440-1310千克/m3。最佳的真空压力:玉米种子(I、II)为4kPa;棉花、黄豆和西瓜(I)种子为3kPa;西瓜(II)、甜瓜和黄瓜种子为2.5kPa;甜菜种子为2kPa;洋葱种子为1.5kPa。最终,数学模型能准确模拟出真空压力。研究结果显示:模型能准确地模拟出精密真空压力播种机的真空度为2.5110-3; 均方根误差为2.7410-2。模拟效率率高达99%。各参数含义回归系数: a,b,c,d,e模型效率:Em均方根误差:Erme试验真空压力 (kPa):Kexp试验真空压力平均值(kPa): Kexp.mean真空预压(kPa):Kpre长度(mm):L每千粒种子质量(g):m1000种子数目:N模型种子数常量:n表面积(mm2):P真空压力(kPa):Pv概率:p确定系数:R2厚度(mm):T宽度(mm):W圆度(%):方差:x2种子密度(kg/m3):k文章概要标题1.引言2.材料和方法3.结果与讨论4.结论5.致谢6.参考资料1.引言精密播种作为主要农业工程研究已经多年。所以,大部分的研究和开发成果已经运用到了农业播种。现在,研究的主要目的是把种子播到一定深度的苗床上。精密播种机必须让种子之间有一定间隔,以适应种子生长。现在,有两种类型的精密播种机:皮带播种机和真空压力播种机。真空压力播种机有一带有固定半径计量孔的真空计量板。计量板应用这些计量手段洞竞赛通过一回收装置. 由于平板旋转、真空所产生的压力使种子从这些孔中漏出. 精密真空压力播种机具有以下优点:更好的工作质量、较低种子损害率、更好地控制和保护种子、还有广泛的适用性。 精密播种机需要把种子播种在一个可靠的环境,使种子发芽并生长。很多
收藏